Lesbians, Utah & Surrogacy Plus Prop 8 Fight Is Televised

Good morning....wanted to update everyone on the televised proceeding for Prop 8 here as follows: http://www.equalrightsfoundation.org/live-updates/

In addition, a surprising admission by a Utah lawmaker.  She is carrying a child for a gay couple as a traditional surrogate

Rep. Christine Johnson will serve an additional role when the Utah Legislature convenes this month. The lesbian lawmaker announced she's a surrogate mother, carrying a baby for two gay men.

Johnson, D-Salt Lake City, said she decided to become artificially impregnated with sperm from one of the men after the two close friends expressed frustration over the difficulty of adopting a child.

Utah law prohibits unmarried couples from adopting and does not recognize gay marriage.

Johnson, 41, who has a 17-year-old daughter from a two-year marriage, is four months pregnant and expecting on June 21.

"I can very much empathize with their desire to become parents and share their lives with and open their hearts to a child," Johnson told the Salt Lake Tribune. "I'm immeasurably grateful to be a mother."

Johnson offered to be a surrogate at no cost to save the Salt Lake County men the prohibitive cost of hiring one - as much as $100,000.

What a nice story about a family and a politician who is not worried about her choices, good ones I may add, affecting her chances at re-election. 

Surrogate Twins Born in India May Be Granted German Visas

German Surrogate Twins Update - Happy New Year to all!  I am certain that 2010 is going to be a great year for all of us.  And, I am also hoping that this is the year that the case of the German Parents stuck in India is resolved by their country.  Again, another reason to think twice before starting your surrogacy journey in a country such as India. 

New Delhi, Jan 4 (IANS) Germany said Monday it would consider giving visas to German twins born to an Indian surrogate mother, as the Supreme Court asked the Indian government to settle the issue in a fortnight through diplomatic channels.

German Ambassador Thomas Mataussek said his country would consider giving visas to the twins if the Indian government approached it.

“If the Indian government approaches us, we will certainly take note of it. We will not reject it outright,” the German envoy told CNN-IBN when asked whether Germany would reconsider giving visas to the twins if the Indian government gave them one-time passport.

“We have to be very careful. We don’t want to set a precedent,” Mataussek said. “We don’t want to encourage people to go down this path. This is not the way to put children into the world,” the envoy added.

Germany does not recognise surrogacy as a means of parenthood.

An apex court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Asok Ganguly gave the government a fortnight to solve the tangle.

Earlier, Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium apprised the court of the government’s effort to settle the issue. He told the bench that the external affairs ministry is in touch with the German embassy and expects some positive solution to the problem at the earliest.

The government, however, needed some more time to continue its effort, said Subramanium, seeking adjournment of the hearing by a fortnight. The bench adjourned the hearing to Jan 18.

The government had earlier moved the apex court challenging a Gujarat High Court order to issue passports to the twins.

The union government is opposed to the grant of Indian passport to the twins on the ground that it would mean granting them Indian citizenship.

The Gujarat High Court gave its order on a lawsuit of a German couple, Jan Balaz and his wife, seeking passports for their twins who were born in January 2008 to a surrogate Indian mother in Gujarat.

The couple came to India in December 2006 in search of a surrogate mother. They entered into an agreement with Marthaben, according to which she lost her right over the child after delivery.

On the plea of the German couple last month during hearing of the government’s lawsuit, the apex court asked the government to provide travel documents to the twins within 48 hours, and asked the couple to approach the German embassy for visa for the twins.

The bench later on Dec 17 considered the question of granting the twins a one-time Indian passport and asked the German couple to convince the court of its bonafides that they would forgo the children’s Indian citizenship after reaching Germany.

The German couple, accordingly, submitted an undertaking to the court that they would submit the passport to the Indian embassy in Germany after reaching there.

In his affidavit to the apex court, Jan Balaz said earlier too he had submitted his passport to the Indian authorities.

Balaz told the court that “he was ready to deposit a reasonable sum equivalent to the fare of three persons before any court in India to secure the travel of the children, if required”.

Solicitor General Subramanium termed Balaz’s undertaking as “fair”, while seeking more time for the government’s continuing diplomatic efforts to secure citizenship and a state for the stateless twins.

If no decision is taken on the legal status of the twins, the legal community has voiced apprehensions that the two children may end up being stateless citizens.

Last month, a Supreme Court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly expressed their dilemma.

“Should we treat children born out of surrogacy as commodities?” they asked Jan Balaz and Susan Lohle after they could not tell the court clearly whether the twins could get German citizenship if India did not grant it to them.

Again, Happy New Year to all!

Theresa Erickson

Gay Surrogacy Advocates are Encouraged by Passage of Vermont Same Sex Marriage Law Passage

As some of you may be aware, Vermont began to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples just last night after a vote made back in April began taking effect at exactly midnight a little over four months after state lawmakers voted to override Gov. Jim Douglas' veto of the legislation. 

Vermont became the fourth state to allow gay marriages on April 7, when the state House and state Senate voted 100-49 and 23-5, respectively, to override a veto by the governor.

This is good news for gay marriage advocates who want all families, including those created through gay surrogacy, to be recognized legally across the country for the sake of their children, as well as the couples themselves.   

In fact, Couples and gay advocates will be marking the day with celebrations, one of which is a wedding reception in Essex that will benefit the Vermont People with AIDS Coalition and other groups.

Should this trend continue across the US?  And, what about California where Prop 8 was passed back in November ruling same sex marriages invalid? 

Subscribe to my blog here

Friday Legal Updates - Surrogacy Legal Battles, Federal Suit Blocking Embryos Research, & Sperm "Brokers"

Good Morning and TGIF to all!   Hope you are well.   Morning radio show starts in about an hour, so here are your Friday Legal Updates.  They are mostly international stories with a federal law suit just filed also added.  Enjoy!

United States - Federal Law Suit Filed to block federally funded human embryo reserach.  "A group of plaintiffs filed a federal lawsuit today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to "enjoin and overturn the controversial guidelines for public funding of embryonic stem cell research that the National Institutes of Health issued on July 7, 2009," according to a press statement...."

It will be interesting to watch this suit play out.  What are your thoughts on stem cell research?

UK - Two directors of a fertility company appeared in court yesterday accused of illegally delivering sperm to women by courier.  They are to appear in court next month.  This is a test case under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of "procuring sperm".  They face two years in jail. 

Australia - A couple must battle the courts to adopt their own son.  I blogged on this case already, but I wanted to repost as I really feel for this couple.  Grandma carried her grandson for her daughter.  Apparently, surrogacy law in NSW has not kept up with science. 

Poland - A surrogate mother is fighting for custody of the child that she gave birth to for another couple from Warsaw.  Polish law does not regulate surrogacy, and despite a written agreement, this looks like a battle for this couple with their gestational carrier.

Uruguay - Uruguay is one step closer to becoming the first country in Latin America to permit same-sex couples to adopt children.  Uruguay had authorized same-sex civil unions last year.

New Zealand - Parents of surrogate born daughter battle to bring her home from Thailand.  The couple is heartbroken as the little girl is the daughter of the Thai surrogate in New Zealand, but the couple are her parents in Thailand.  The couple claims to sought legal advice, but this unfortunately looks like another issue with fertility tourism in certain countries.

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

Top Ten Questions to Ask Before Signing Up with an IVF Clinic, Law Office, or Agency as a Surrogate

As I was reviewing some incoming emails this week, I received one from a woman who could not decide how to move forward in becoming a surrogate.  First, she went on the internet, then she went onto Craigslist, where she found several ads declaring why they were the best.  So, in order to help her and others looking into becoming a surrogate, here are ten things you need to think about first:

1. Contact a Reproductive Lawyer or IVF Clinic for recommendations - the lawyers and the doctors are the licensed professionals in this field, as are the psychologists, and they can often give good advice on where to begin your journey.  You might also find a lawyer you want to work with when it becomes time to sign and review agreements with Intended Parents.

2. What if the lawyer or clinic has their own agency for matching surrogates with parents?  Well, I myself own an agency, so I can speak clearly to the potential conflicts of interest that can arise between you and the agency or the clinic; however, here are a few things to remember:

             a. Doctors and lawyers are licensed professionals who have licenses that they have worked hard to obtain and maintain.  At least in my office, surrogates always get their own attorneys, their own psychologist, and their own support separate from me.  But remember, doctors are not lawyers just as lawyers are not doctors - it is that simple. 

             b. If an IVF physician has an agency, how is their money held for their surrogates?  It is unlikely that they are licensed and bonded escrow holders, and they are not attorneys whose clients are protected by the state bar's client security fund, so ask that question.  Physicians do not have the same protections as the attorney's trust account does. 

             c. With an IVF Physician, what happens at 12 weeks when you are released to your OB physician?  Do they have the staff to do that, and who is that?  How does the clinic still handle and facilitate your arrangement, if at all?  Make sure you are being supported all the way to the end, not just until the pregnancy reaches the first trimester.   

            d. Now, as for your health and physical well being, the other issue that some have is the conflict of interest that a doctor has with his patient, the surrogate, and his patient, the Intended Parents.  Again, as it has to do with your health and well-being, make certain that you get independent legal representation and ask questions.  It is your body and your health, so you must be diligent in making certain that you are being protected too.  Many, many IVF Physicians are wonderful, caring doctors, but you must ask questions to ensure you are being protected.  Also, ask what their success rates are and how long they have been practicing IVF?

3.  Agencies - yes, they are unregulated, unlicensed, etc. - but, speak with them too - better yet, meet with them in their office and meet the staff.  Some are very reputable.  Ask a reproductive lawyer or IVF clinic for recommendations.  Then, call and interview them.  Ask them the following:

             a.  Are they a match making service only, or do they provide support throughout the entire process through delivery and beyond?

             b. How are their surrogates and donors funds held?  Make certain that they are held by an escrow company or by an attorney.

             c.  What type of support do they provide?  Get specifics.  What type of staff do they have and how many people are there for you in the office?

             d. Do they have parents waiting?  If not, how long will you have to wait?  Remember, promises of being matched immediately are empty, as each case if different.  Also, ask how many matches they do per year and per month. 

             e. How long have they been in business?  Can you speak with other surrogates?

             f.  Agencies are not medical providers, but the reputable ones know what they are doing and are instrumental in helping you select a physician, psychologist, etc., as well as helping you get answers when the medical aspect is unclear.  Don't think that you will be left with inadequate medical care if you go through an agency.

             g. Reputable agencies are insured against Errors & Omissions Insurance.  Ask if they carry it.

             h. Does the agency have surrogate support group meetings and/or annual parties?  These are always alot of fun, and there are usually prizes for the winners of contests.  This is also a great way to meet other women like yourself who are going through many of the same things.

4.  Beware of agencies, clinics or law offices that claim that they work with high profile clients and celebrities.  Remember, if that were really the case, you would not know about it - that is not information one should or would want to share if that is the case.  No one wants what Sarah Jessica Parker's surrogate went through.  And, don't be drawn in by the expectation of working with a celebrity. 

5. Who is going to be there 24 hours a day to answer questions or take my call in the case of an emergency?  Not just during the first trimester, but throughout the entire pregnancy and at the end.  Ask if there is anyone that does that in the office of the agency, lawyer, or doctor.  This is very important. 

6.  Although there are many things that you need to do yourself, such as deal with your insurance or make doctor appointments, as you are the patient, is there going to be someone there to help you navigate this new and unknown journey.

7.  Is the clinic, agency or law office going to screen your intended parents?  Do your intended parents get a background check and a psychological education session to make certain we are a good match?

8.  Is the agency, law office or clinic going to support me when I need it the most?  For example, my intended parents don't pay a medical bill?  Will they support me in getting this resolved?  Will they help me write letters or handle it legally?  Remember, the agreement is between you and your intended parents, but you will need support.   What a good clinic, agency or law office will do is provide you with support throughout the entire pregnancy, even if you think you may not need it.  In fact, they should be acting as a neutral third party for any uncomfortable situations that may arise with your intended parents so that the situation can be resolved without any bad feelings between the parties.  They should also have the professional experience (not just that I am a doctor, lawyer or I have been a surrogate once before) to know of the possible issues that can arise and how they can be resolved with the least amount of drama.  

9. Does the clinic or agency or law office provide a blanket agreement (one that they have prepared and given to you and your intended parents ) with no counsel?  If so, be careful.  A contract should be drafted by an attorney for the intended parents that is drafted specifically for your case.  You should then review with an independent attorney to ensure that is covers your particular situation.

10. Last important point is that is in no way an exhaustive list.  Use your head and use your gut before agreeing to anything.  Making a list of pros and cons is also helpful before you select the clinic, agency or law office that you are going to work with.  Good luck. 

The Sticky Issues Surrounding Surrogacy/Gestational Carriers

Today I have included a guest post to mix it up alittle for those of you who are followers.  Enjoy!

We’ve come a long way since the early days of assisted fertility and conception and the first IVF baby. Childless couples who yearn to have child who’s biologically theirs (fully or partly) are now able to move beyond adoption and try surrogacy and ovum and sperm donation. Advantageous as they are, these issues are a major cause of legal and ethical concern. While certain groups of people abhor and are violently against any form of conception that doesn’t involve the legal sexual union of a man and a woman, there are others who are concerned about the opportunities for misuse that these kinds of fertility treatments pose.

 

And so we have the laws that determine ownership of the child when the sperm and/or egg are from different people. Since nature intended the woman to be the carrier and sustainer of the child for the first nine months, surrogacy involves a third party who has to be female. And this gives rise to a new complication – how do we assign ownership or claim a lack of it when a woman “rents” out her womb for nine months? It’s a well known fact that motherhood starts the moment the child is conceived – the woman carrying the child is able to feel a distinct emotional connection and bonding with the baby even before it is born.

 

And this is why it’s understandable that some surrogate moms are reluctant to hand over the children they have carried to term to the intended parents as they originally planned to. Looking at the issue beyond the emotional context, the law says that a surrogate is deemed the biological mother if her own eggs have been used for the fertilization process. The sperm donor, even if he is the intended father, is just that in the eyes of the law – an anonymous sperm donor who has no biological claim over the child conceived and born. On the other hand, if the child is conceived using the intended mother’s egg (or a donor egg) and the intended father’s sperm (or donor sperm), the surrogate has no biological claims over the child she carries.

 

It is in the best interests of intended parents to make sure that they take care of all the legal loopholes that are possible when they want a child through assisted fertility methods, by hiring a good agency and by retaining sound legal counsel to draw up the necessary papers well before the whole process begins. A few complications that may arise are listed below:

 

  • The surrogate mother may not want to give up the child once it is born.
  • The intended parents may be separated or get divorced before the child is born. In this case, either both parents may not want the child or both may want it and an ugly custody battle may be in the offing.
  • One of the intended parents or both of them may die before the child is born.
  • If the couple is of the same sex, they need to take into consideration the local laws relating to surrogacy and same-sex adoptions.  

Ensuring that nothing is left to chance is the only way to save yourself a bunch of emotional and legal hassles and take home a healthy baby that’s all yours in nine or ten months.

 

By-line:

This post was contributed by Holly McCarthy, who writes on the subject of jobs in criminal justice. She invites your feedback at hollymccarthy12@gmail.com

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Subscribe to my blog at:

http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

Surrogate Mother May Be Required to Pay Child Support in New Zealand!

According to the New Zealand Press Association, a surrogate mother residing in New Zealand may be required to pay support to the Australian government as shown below:

"A New Zealand surrogate mother could be forced to pay child support for the baby she had for two gay Australian men.

It is understood the year-old surrogate baby girl is being raised by her biological father and his male partner in Queensland, who are her legal guardians, the Sunday Star Times reported.

The Australian government had provided some child support benefits for the father to stay home and care for her, as new parents were entitled.

However, the surrogate was tracked down and asked to contribute, which she has refused to do.

Surrogacy is illegal in Queensland and many other parts of Australia."

Click Here for Complete Article

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

 

CBS Morning News & Surrogacy

There is a tentatively scheduled broadcast regarding Surrogacy this coming Sunday the 25th of January.  It is likely to feature myself, Melissa Brisman of New Jersey, a surrogate from Melissa's office, the staff and doctors at La Jolla IVF, as well as a surrogate and couple from Conceptual Options.  Check your local listings for CBS Morning News.

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

 

Australia Looking to Update Surrogacy Laws

I have been following the national discussion surrounding surrogacy in Australia, and I thought that it might be helpful to include information coming from an Australian couple living there and watching every day.

"The Australian Standing Committee of Attorney Generals (ie, a collective of top-level government lawmakers from each state and territory in Australia) released a discussion paper on Monday aimed at getting comment on a proposal to create a national surrogacy law for Australian citizens. The proposal deals primarily with altruistic surrogacy in Australia. While the some of the proposals affecting couples needed surrogacy in Australia are preposterous, they do no not affect the Australians going to foreign countries to create their families through commercial surrogacy. However, it appears that commercial surrogacy abroad for Australian citizens is now on the radar.

 
In response to the racist and discriminatory statements made in the proposal, it appears at this stage that federal decision makers are piggy-backing international commercial surrogacy issues onto the national discussion with little thought to the real issues faced by those of us going abroad for surrogacy."
 
 
 

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

Surrogacy Cases We Can Be Glad We Rarely See...

I read this post from an attorney in Georgia, who became involved when child support became an issue - yes, child support.  This Surrogate is truly an angel, and let's be glad these types of cases are rare.  I just wanted to add this one to make everyone go - ouch....

"Various issues arise as the concept of surrogacy comes before the legislatures of the country.  One case that I handled for the Attorney General’s Office dealt with a surrogate mother, and is an example of how crazy surrogacy issues can become.  This lady had been hired to have a baby for a multi-millionaire.  He was not married and seemed to be tiring of his fortunes when he decided that he would like to have an heir.  The surrogate mother gave birth to a healthy little girl and the man accepted the child, made payment, and went on his merry way.  Then two months later, the man had one of his “assistants” drop the baby back off at the surrogate mother’s home with a note stating that he simply could not emotionally handle the responsibilities of being a parent. "

Click Here for Complete Article

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

Dennis Quaid Settles with Hospital on Surrogacy Twins injected with Heparin

People Magazine reports that Cedars Sinai in Los Angeles has settled with Dennis Quaid for $750,000.00 for the accidental overdose of his twins born via surrogate mother back in 2007.

We are glad to hear that the children have recovered from the medical scare. 

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net
 

 

Surrogacy is a minefield....especially for Thomas Frank!


Well, the Wall Street Journal has another piece on reproductive technologies today, which will likely bring them as much criticism at the New York Times Piece did on Alex Kuczynski. What amazes me the most is how Mr. Frank condemns Mrs. Kuczynski for choosing to use a surrogate mother to have her child, as if she indeed had another option. She is not some Hollywood starlet who chose not to “deal with birth.” In fact, the Hollywood excuse is way over utilized…isn’t pregnancy the new “in” thing for celebrity moms? Oh, how I digress......

Yes, the NYT pictures were the wrong choice – period, but the focus of the piece was her and how she created her family, as she is the one of us that most know. In fact, I found most of her comments, to include those revolving around her vacation before the birth and her ability to drink alcohol while her surrogate could not, as merely attempts to help her better deal with her own issues of not being able to carry her own child. 

In fact, many of her critics spent too much time attacking Kuczynski, instead of focusing on her beautiful son. 

Mr. Frank, on the other hand, has issues with surrogacy on many levels. In fact, he states the following:

“When money is exchanged for pregnancy, some believe, surrogacy comes close to organ-selling, or even baby-selling. It threatens to commodify not only babies, but women as well, putting their biological functions up for sale like so many Jimmy Choos. If surrogacy ever becomes a widely practiced market transaction, it will probably make pregnancy into just another dirty task for the working class, with wages driven down and wealthy couples hiring the work out because it’s such a hassle to be pregnant.”

I wonder what surrogates feel about this? I don’t think that they appreciate that their feelings are being trumped by Frank’s desire to make the transaction a “dirty task for the working class.” Most surrogates feel that they are helping someone in such a profound way, with money only being a small part of the transaction. Wouldn’t you agree?

Click Here for the Complete Article by Thomas Frank

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer
www.ericksonlaw.net

Our Economy, Surrogacy and Egg Donors - There is more to this process than money...

With the media, including the Wall Street Journal and Fox News, focused on how the economy is causing more women to sign up as egg donors and surrogates, our industry needs to be sensitive to this.  Specifically, we need to be certain that these women are doing it for the right reasons, as well as for the money. 

There is quite a bit for them to think about before committing themselves to this process, to include medical risks, the emotional aspects and the time commitment. This process is not an easy buck for anyone, and the reproductive community needs to make certain that we do all that we can that they are thoroughly and adequately informed. 

Click Here for an Article on this Subject

Click Here for a Similar Article on this Subject

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Why a Lawyer/Attorney is so Important in the Area of Third Party Reproduction

As most of your reading this know…having an attorney when diving into the prospect of becoming a parent through Assisted Reproductive Technologies is one of the most important things that you can do. That becomes even more important once Egg Donors and Surrogates also get involved. Having a lawyer, especially one that specializes in Reproductive law, becomes more important for a few reasons:

1.      EXPERIENCE & KNOWLEDGE. A lawyer within the field of Reproductive law will not only know the laws concerning surrogacy and egg donation in each state, but they will also have the experience in dealing with prospective parents as well as surrogates and egg donors.

 

2.      CONTRACTS. An experienced attorney will be able to draft a comprehensive surrogacy and/or egg donation agreement that will be able to address any issues, whether monetary or not, that may arise during the course of the contract.

 

3.      TRUST ACCOUNTS/FUND MANAGEMENT. A lawyer experienced in reproductive law will be able to tell prospective parents what fees and/or expenses are customary and will be able to fully handle your trust account along with keeping your relationship with your surrogate and/donor separate from any issues regarding funds.

 

4.      DISPUTE RESOLUTION. With the help of an experienced attorney, you will have an intermediary for any disputes that may arise during the surrogate pregnancy between you and your surrogate.

 

5.      RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT. Having an attorney that drafts your surrogacy contract and/or egg donation contract can aid prospective parents in deciding what type of relationship they will have with either their egg donor and/or their surrogate throughout the pregnancy and after.

 

Along with these few reasons there are numerous others that illustrate why you should have an experienced reproductive lawyer prior to embarking on egg donation and/or surrogacy. What are your thoughts?

 

Using an Agency for Surrogacy

With the high costs of infertility treatments it is no wonder that many prospective intended parents head to the internet to look for a surrogate instead of using a surrogacy agency. However, this is often a very bad idea.

Even though agencies are often expensive, they are often the safest way to go because they have already prescreened their surrogates prior to allowing intended parents to meet with them. Additionally, agencies will act as a buffer between intended parents and surrogates to cut down on conflicts that may arise in this emotionally charged situation.

Yet, just like when you are choosing your surrogate you should also do plenty of research on different agencies to determine which will best fit your needs before you ultimately decide on which one to choose. All in all, it is the best idea to use an agency instead of just finding a surrogate on the internet. You will end up saving not only money, but also have a better chance at saving yourself from heartache.

What are your thoughts?

India Gestational Carrier/Surrogacy Update!

After a 10 week battle, it appears that the Japanese baby girl born through Surrogacy in India will be finally going home to Japan. The Supreme Court in India ruled today that the little girl needs to be issued a passport and travel documents for Japan. The passport office in India stated that the passport and travel documents are being issued stating that the little girl is a citizen of Japan since that is where her father is from and lives. This is a huge decision and a happy one at that.

Click Here for Entire Article

India Gestational Carrier/Surrogacy Baby May Be Going Home to Japan!

As everyone will remember from prior blogs, the little girl born with the help of an Indian surrogate has been kept in India with her paternal grandmother since birth because of a long legal battle. However, it looks like she will finally get all of the paperwork that she needs to finally join her father in Japan.

Hopefully, these reports will turn out to be true and she will finally be able to leave India.

Click Here for Complete Article

India Surrogacy/Gestational Carrier Laws Tightening Up

The formerly lenient surrogacy laws in India have recently become a lot stricter with India’s parliament changing surrogacy laws in order to protect surrogate mothers in India from being taken advantage of. They have additionally made it mandatory for Intended Parents and prospective surrogates to have surrogacy contracts and to have all of the insurance together prior to the surrogate becoming pregnant.

They are hoping that this will decrease the number of women being taken advantage of when foreigners come to India to get an Indian surrogate. This is going to also make it safer for intended parents who want to travel to India to get a surrogate because these laws will not only make the entire process safer for surrogates, but also for intended parents.

Click Here for Complete Article

Ohio Judge Moves in Right Direction for Gestational Surrogacy

A judge in the state of Ohio took an encouraging step in the right direction for Assisted Reproduction Law. The judge ruled in favor of a single father, who used IVF and surrogacy to conceive his twins. However, he was not listed on the birth certificate; instead the surrogate was listed as the only known parent because Ohio state law did not recognize surrogacy. The judge in this case rule that the father’s name could be put on the birth certificate as the children’s biological parent. This is a huge step for surrogacy in the state of Ohio.

Click Here for Complete Article and Pictures

Affording IVF, Surrogacy, and Egg Donation in These Tough Economic Times

Many people thinking about using assisted reproductive technologies to start a family think of almost every possible outcome, except for how much all of it will cost - considering that most, if not all, health insurance policies will not cover assisted reproductive technologies. Even though these expenses are great, and even without the added expenses associated with the use of a surrogate and/or an egg donor, it is still possible for many…IF they just look through their financials and really focus on how much it could possibly cost them and what they can to do to budget and afford these costly, but ultimately priceless expenses.

So, it is best to start early with your own financial assessment and investigate the options available for financing. Yes, they are still out there, despite what is going on with Wall Street. Once that is done, ask questions of your doctor, your agency, your friends, and anyone else that have gone through this - after all, the only dumb question is the one that is never asked.

Click Here for Complete Article

India Surrogacy/Gestational Surrogacy Case Update 9.29.08

Remember the Japanese baby born to an India surrogate, who was prohibited from being taken from India by her father? Well, India’s Supreme Court ruled on Monday, stating that the Indian government had exactly one month to decide whether or not to grant traveling papers to the child to allow her to be taken from India to her father’s home of Japan.

Hopefully, this case will have a happy outcome for this almost three month old little girl. We will wait and see what happens.

Click Here for the Complete Article

The $100,000 Baby - Egg Donation & Surrogacy

MSN money posted an article that clearly wanted to make a statement against would be parents that cannot have babies the old fashion way.  Do we really sit in small groups at ASRM and talk about designing a new line of babies - heck no!  Instead, we educate, research, and continue progress to help all would be parents become just that - parents.  Money is always involved, but this article was too simplistic and merely was an attempt at sensationalism.  What do you think?

Click Here for Article

 

Surrogacy Reproductive Tourism - United States vs. India

I have been reading a lot of news and blogs regarding India and their booming "surrogacy business."  In fact, I have spoken to quite a few potential clients over the last few months, and I always advise them that they have to go into this with their eyes wide open.  More specifically, what the laws, and how will they affect you?  Here in the US, you will not have a legal struggle to take your baby home if you and your spouse divorce.  What other law exist or fail to exist that may place the rights to your baby at risk? 

Next step, what are the health standards in the country where your baby will be gestated?  What is the country's rate of infant mortality?  How is their prenatal care?  What rules and regulations will govern your IVF procedure?

While this is only the tip of the iceberg, make certain that you think all of this through, and do what is best for you as a couple or individual.  Please post your thoughts.
 

Theresa Erickson Appears on Doctor Radio - Sirius

Today, I appeared on Dr. Radio, Channel 114, along with one of our four time surrogates in order give their show a perspective on surrogacy.  It went well, and I encourage everyone to listen when they get a chance.  The IVF physician who also appeared in studio gave some great information for everyone.  Happy listening!

Dr. Radio Sirius Channel 114

MTV is looking to do an episode on Surrogacy

Here is the information for anyone out there:

ARE YOU A SURROGATE MOTHER?

MTV’S TRUE LIFE  WANTS TO HEAR YOUR STORY!

 

Are you a young person who is acting as a surrogate mother? MTV’s True Life is looking for young people who are preparing to give birth to another couple’s baby who are interested in sharing the story of their unique pregnancy.

 

Do you enjoy being pregnant? Are you preparing to give the gift of life to a couple in need by carrying their child for nine months? Have you been a surrogate more than once, for strangers, friends, or family members? Or is this your first time carrying someone else’s baby? Does your family or significant other disagree with your decision to help other families have children by repeatedly enduring pregnancy? Or are you an intended parent, using a surrogate to carry the child that you cannot? Are you a same-sex couple desperate for a biological child of your own?

 

If you appear to be between the ages of 16 and 28, and want to share the story of your multiple pregnancy, email us at tlfall08@mtvn.com with all of the details. Be sure to include your name, location, phone number and a photo, if possible.

 

Note: Erickson Law is not endorsing this program.  We are merely providing information for anyone that is interested. 

Grandmother Acts as Gestational Surrogate

According to officials in Tokyo, a 61 year old woman recently gave birth to her own grandchild. The woman was acting as a gestational surrogate for her own daughter who had been born without a uterus. The officials would not release when or where the baby was born, or even the baby’s gender. This seems to be the oldest woman to ever have been a surrogate.

This is one of those heart-warming stories of how good humans can actually be. This 61 year old woman went through 9 months of pregnancy so that her daughter, who was unable to have her own children, would be able to have a child. Unfortunately, the Japanese officials also have not released whether or not an egg donor was used or any other details. This is truly an exciting and heart-warming tale.

Full Article Click Here

India Surrogacy/Gestational Surrogate Update

The baby in legal limbo in India is now safely in the custody of her Grandmother. The Supreme Court in India ruled today that the baby should be in the custody of her grandmother and the police, nor the NGO, could do anything to stop this. This decision finally came after a long legal battle keeping the baby’s father, who is from Japan, from taking the baby home following her birth via a gestational carrier.

 

The court has also scheduled another hearing for September 15th to allow the NGO to explain why India’s lack of Surrogacy laws has any standing in this case and would keep the baby from going home to Japan. Hopefully, this baby, who is biologically not related to the Surrogate mother, but is biologically related to her father, can leave the country of India.

Article in full - click here

India Surrogacy Case Turns Ugly

A beautiful baby girl was recently born in India via a surrogate. For the past few years this has become almost common place in India where people from around the world come to get a surrogate mother for $6250 - $15000. The compensation may seem like too small of a sum by European and American standards, yet this is a fortune for these women in India who mostly come from impoverished backgrounds.

The media frenzy in this case though is not coming from the fact that this is a surrogacy or that the surrogate mother is from India. The frenzy is surrounding the fact that the baby’s biological parents have divorced (prior to her birth) and even though her father is desperately trying to “adopt” his own daughter the Indian government will not allow it because it doesn’t allow single men to adopt children.

Additionally, the surrogate mother does not want to adopt the baby girl, which is completely her right and not what she had been expecting, but the mind boggling issue is the fact that the biological mother, and now ex-wife of the biological father, does not want anything to do with the baby. Therefore, this baby girl is stuck in the hospital in India while her father desperately tries to get the Indian government to allow him to take her home.

This will definitely be and interesting case to watch, hopefully it doesn’t become more heartbreaking than it already is. What are your thoughts?

Full Article can be found here.

AHCO Maternity Card Provider Being Sued


AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Tuesday, April 15, 2008

The Texas attorney general's office has filed a lawsuit accusing an Austin company of selling fraudulent discount health card plans to pregnant women, the office announced Monday.

The lawsuit claims that Austin-based AHCO Direct, also known as Affordable HealthCare Options, and its owners, Brian McDonald and Aaron Bouren, sold fake discount cards to uninsured pregnant women that promised to cover up to 60 percent of maternity-related costs.

The two are accused of multiple violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Abbott said in a statement.

The cards were marketed to uninsured pregnant women via Google ads, the lawsuit said.

See remainder of article here: http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/04/15/0415aghealth.html

Surrogacy via Newsweek and the Military

Well, I have to say that I am quite surprised by the statistics that were set forth in Newsweek's article, "Womb for Rent." 

See link at http://www.newsweek.com/id/129594

To be quite honest, I did speak with the reporter, Lorraine Ali, and I assured her that the statistics she had that claimed military surrogates were 50% of all surrogates was way off base.  In fact, I had confirmed that with my colleagues, and they agreed.  I am certain that their reason for pushing those numbers was to incite a frenzy about military insurance. 

Well, as a former military dependent, I know for a fact that military insurance is not a privilege that is being abused in any way.  In fact, military members "pay" for this insurance by receiving lower compensation and benefits than their civilian counterparts.  I even pulled out a Department of Defense yearly update that my husband had received back in 2001, and it clearly stated the value of the insurance that we received.  Specifically, it provided that his salary was actually $1850.00 more per year due to the value of our insurance, which he essentially paid for.  

So, I wonder where this will all go?  What do you think?  I was quite dissatisfied with this article.   

Cost of Adoption Update

This information is always helpful when clients are trying to weigh adoption vs. surrogacy.  I hope that you find this helpful:

How much did adoptions cost in 2006 and 2007? More than 1,500 AF readers completed our survey on the cost of adoption—thanks to everyone for their valuable input!

Here's a breakdown of the total cost of adoption:

http://www.adoptivefamilies.com/articles.php?aid=1685

Do-It-Yourself Surrogacies - Beware

I just saw a great blog post that I would like to share:

By Robin von Halle

http://conceptionconnections.wordpress.com

There’s a reason to go with a reputable agency that specializes in matching egg donors and gestational surrogates to those who are unable to bear children through traditional means. Services go beyond vetting candidates to make sure they’re on the up and up and emotionally equipped for the job. We also bring in experts to guide intended parents and donors and surrogates through the complex legal and psychological issues.

The importance of this role has been brought home through news coverage in recent months of heartbreaking situations that have arisen when couples have followed a do-it-yourself path.

Back in October, the Today Show did a story on Tom and Gwyn Lamitina, a Florida couple who fought for but lost custody of their daughter who was born by a surrogate they had hired who decided to keep the baby. Since then, the couple has filed a civil case accusing the surrogate mother of fraud – saying she produced a “litany of lies and dreadful acts of deceit.”

Two months later FOX News told the story of a South Carolina woman accused of promising couples she would be their surrogate – who exploited at least six people out of $14,000.

An agency with a proven track record and references supporting it will help intended parents offset the risks that can be involved with this process. The good ones will provide psychological screening of surrogates, legal representation for all parties and a support system for all those involved.

Caveat emptor is, unfortunately, the operative phrase when people show no qualms to take advantage of couples who are desperate to create families, leaving them financially strung out and without a child.

Buyer Beware - speak with an attorney first! Surrogate Mother Scam!

Jessica O'Donnell allegedly posed as a war widow, saying her husband had been killed in Iraq, WYFF-TV in Greenwood, S.C., reported. Investigators say she offered to bear children for couples, telling them she wanted to help because of her personal tragedy.

http://www.wyff4.com/news/14843559/detail.html?rss=gs&psp=news

Gay Man Wins Surrogacy Dispute - Minnesota Update

A New York gay lawyer who made an agreement with his niece that she would bear a child for him through gestational surrogacy won a ruling from Minnesota's Court of Appeals on December 11, approving custody and full parental rights.

Remainder of Article as follows:

http://www.gaycitynews.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=19133589&BRD=2729&PAG=461&dept_id=568860&rfi=6

Legal opinion is as follows:

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/archive/ctapun/0712/opa070452-1211.htm

Congrats to my friend and fellow counsel, Steve Snyder, on this big win!

Ohio Court Rules Surrogate Can Keep Payments - News Update on Ohio Case

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A surrogate mother can keep $48,000 in child support from the biological father, even though she later lost custody of the triplets to him, a state court ruled.

The state Superior Court ruled Thursday that Danielle Bimber does not have to repay James Flynn of Kirtland, Ohio, who had given her the money before the same appeals court granted him custody in April 2006.

The children were born in Erie more than four years ago, conceived with donor eggs fertilized by Flynn’s sperm and placed in Bimber’s uterus.

Remainder of Article: http://www.lancastereaglegazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080105/UPDATES01/80105005/-1/rssupdates

News Brief: Ohio Surrogate Contract Upheld

This case has been around in two different court systems involving an Ohio man wanted to be a parent. He used an egg donor from Texas, and the eggs were fertilized with his sperm and the resulting embryo was implanted in a woman from Pennsylvania. She gave birth to triplets. The deal fell apart when the woman who gave birth took the triplets home. Litigation ensued in both Pennsylvania and Ohio followed.

In December the Ohio Supreme Court issued an opinion you can find as follows: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/0/2007/2007-ohio-6750.pdf

It is a short opinion, both majority and dissent. The majority states that there isn’t any Ohio policy  about gestational surrogacy and so there’s no reason not to enforce the contract. They go as far as allowing consideration of an award of damages against the surrogate for breaching her obligations. 

Here are some other opinions on the matter: http://lexfamilia.wordpress.com/feed/

 

Wombs for Rent - What do you think of using a gestational carrier in India

The following article speaks about the recent media attention to gestational carriers in India.  I have not done enough research on the establishments in India; however, I do think that the laws in some US States are straightforward enough to keep people from venturing there.  Price is certainly an issue, as the carriers in India are not requesting as much as carriers do here in the US - however, I would need to view their medical facilities, the health of the carriers, as well as determine the laws that exist there, if any.  Regardless, this article is certainly food for thought.

See link:

http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/india/