Friday Legal Updates™- Australia Surrogacy, Indiana Surrogacy & Twitter/Facebook IVF Fund

Surrogacy News has been big this week in Australia, specifically in Queensland - and our updates will focus on where this will take the people of Australia in their quest to have a child via surrogacy.  But, first we will start with Indiana, where a couple is fighting for the right to have their names on the birth certificate of their child.

Indiana - The biological parents of a child born via surrogacy are challenging a ruling by the Indiana courts.  The Court of Appeals is to hear arguments this week.  A trial court denied their request as follows:

"A trial court judge denied the biological parents' petition to establish paternity and maternity for the child, ruling that "Indiana law does not permit a non birth mother to establish maternity. Indiana law holds the birth mother is the legal maternal mother."  The surrogate mother filed an affidavit in support of the biological parents' petition.  The biological parents appealed, arguing that the paternity statute denies women equal protection and should be declared unconstitutional."

Facebook & Twitter IVF Fund - Interesting story.  What are your thoughts?

 "The invitation went out by e-mail, Facebook and Twitter almost simultaneously to friends of San Francisco's Molly and Brian Walsh. Its title was tantalizing: "Makin' Whoopie." But its purpose was pure, as well as purely provocative.

"You can't help us in the bedroom, but you can help us make a baby," read the invitation to the party, which may have been a Bay Area first - a fundraiser to collect money for costly fertility procedures. With insurance companies reluctant to pay for the cost of in-vitro fertilization and few states with laws requiring insurers to do so, couples unable to pay for the procedure, which runs $12,000 on average, have few resources other than their own creativity.

Two low-profile national nonprofits, the International Council on Infertility Information Dissemination in Arlington, Va., and BUMPS (Bringing U Maternal and Parental Success) in South Florida, offer in-vitro fertilization services to couples without the money or insurance to pay, and who meet select criteria. Together, they assist fewer than 100 couples annually.

Despite their online know-how, the Walshes had not searched the Web for outsiders' help.

"It never occurred to me to reach out to them - I'd reach out to my own community first," said Molly Walsh, 38, head of business development at USA Hosts/Key Events. Her husband, Brian, 37, is the founder and chief executive of Castfire, a video publishing company. The couple, who met at a friend's house in 2006, are participants in Nevada's Burning Man festival and immersed in social networking, for business and pleasure.

Their decision to go public with a private matter was not easy. They feared backlash because the nature of their crisis was not life-threatening. Moreover, they had already saved $10,000, but were overwhelmed by the cost of the treatment - $25,000 to $30,000 in their case because they also need genetic testing of the fertilized embryos. Brian Walsh has Marfan's syndrome, a connective tissue disease, which they do not want to pass on to their offspring. There is also the race against the fertility clock."

Australia - Non-commercial surrogacy is no longer a crime in Queensland after a weeklong debate where sparks were flying over same sex and single parent surrogacy.  Although they do not expect to see surrogacy occuring in great numbers, many are upset with the results. Unfortunately, many also think that any payments to surrogates under the table will be difficult to stop.  One must note, however, that the surrogate is still entitled to not relinquish the baby.  An important note for those thinking of this as an option there. 

Georgia Embryo Legislation Update - It's Not Over Yet!

Rules Committee passes SB 169 - heads to a full Senate vote TODAY!  According to Resolve, they have issued the following statement:

 

Georgia Bill to restrict IVF patients goes to Senate vote.
Add Your Voice to Stop This Bill This Week!

UPDATE: On Wednesday, March 11 the Georgia Senate Rules Committee passed SB 169, sending it to the full Senate for a vote.  The vote will take place sometime Thursday, March 12. There will be no testimony from the public allowed. 

GA RESIDENTS we URGE you to act today, March 12:
1.  Continue to call, write and fax every Georgia Senator. If you already sent a letter, send another one! To send a NEW letter to every Senator, click here.
2.  Call every Senator and tell them "I oppose SB 169".  For a list of Senators, follow this link, then click on each Senator's name to find their office phone number.  http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/senate/senatelist.php
3.  Come to the Capitol!  We urge you to come today, March 12 between 10:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Come to the 3rd floor and you will receive further instructions.  Click here for more details about how to prepare.

In addition, according to AJC, the House has passed the following bill:

"The state House on Thursday passed a bill that could make Georgia the first state in nation to provide adoption of human embryos.

House Bill 388 passed in a 96 to 66 vote that fell mostly, but not entirely along party lines. Most Republicans voted for it, most Democrats voted against.

State Rep. James Mills (R-Gainesville), the bill’s author, presented the Option to Adoption Act as a safeguard against mothers who agree carry the fetuses of infertile couples from refusing to give up the infants after birth.

Some opponents characterized the bill as a back door attempt to outlaw abortion.

One conservative Republican, state Rep. Bobby Franklin (R-Marietta) argued that the bill amounts “to openly trafficking (embryonic) humans to the adoption market.”

But state Rep. Mike Jacobs (R-Dunwoody), a co-sponsor, disputed both arguments.

“There is no hidden agenda here,” said Jacobs. “This is a good pro-family bill.”

What are your thoughts on this legislation in Georgia obviously in response to the "Octomom?"
 

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

Georgia Bill Requiring Oversight on IVF Likely Dead Until Next Year

According to Medical News Today and National Partnership, it looks as if the Georgia bill (SB169) is “dead” until next year.  We had all suspected that this would happen, but again, we need to remain vigilant, as they may try and slip it through next year. 

This Georgia bill was the first attempt in the US to restrict the number of embryos implanted into a woman following IVF, and is now being following by Missouri.  Critics, such as Resolve and AFA, feel that the bills will produce devastating effects on those who want to have children but cannot without the help of IVF.

I am certain that this topic will be greatly debated at ASRM this year, and I look forward to being a part of that.  I would also like to know what your thoughts on this are and how you can help this sort of “reactive” legislation from being enacted in your own state?

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

Georgia Embryo Legislation Update - Resolve.org

In order to keep everyone posted on the situation on the ground in Georgia, Resolve has updated us with the following information, as the Georgia legislature has yet to update their site.

"UPDATE!  The Special Subcommittee formed last week to provide time to study SB 169 met this morning at 9:30 a.m. for 30 minutes.  A new version of SB 169 was introduced.  The new version was voted on by the full HHS Committee at 10:30 a.m. this morning and the bill passed by a vote of 7-6.  The revised SB 169 bill will now go to the Rules Committee where further changes may be made, then to the full Senate for a vote, perhaps as early as Wednesday.  The revised SB 169 bill has not been posted online but RESOLVE will post a link to the revised bill as soon as possible. "

Ladies and Gentleman of Georgia, we need to continue contacting the legislature in the State of Georgia to let them know this needs to be stopped for the sake of families everywhere.

 

FRIDAY LEGAL UPDATES - State of Georgia Still On Legislative Alert, Missouri Targeting Fertility Treatments, New York Denies Couple Right to Sperm, UK Allowing Second Parent, South Korean Egg Donor Lawsuit, & Ireland

Georgia – Update from this week’s legislation n Georgia. SB169 has already been addressed at the subcommittee level, and they have made some decisions, although not certain what they are at this time. In fact, this went through much quicker through subcommittee than others had suspected – which is why I told everyone yesterday that the “best defense is a good offense.” Now is definitely not the time to sit back and wait. 

The legislature is also hearing bill HB388 today, which effectively would to change the definition of "child" to include a human embryo. 

As for SB 204, it is expected to be heard next week, which effectively would make embryo donation follow the same rules as adoption. 

Missouri – Rep. Dr. Rob Schaaf, a Republican, has proposed state legislation intended to prevent any woman undergoing IVF there from following the “Octomom’s” example. His bill, HB810, if passed would limit the number of embryos a physician can implant into a woman as delineated in the guidelines via the ASRM guidelines. Of course, this bill will then subject doctors in the state to discipline by the Missouri Board of Registration if the rule is violated. The legislation does not prevent physicians from recommending that women can seek fertility treatment outside of the state. ASRM supports this bill.

New YorkA New York Appeals Court has denied a couple the right to their son’s sperm in order to have a grandchild with the help of a surrogate mother. The son left sperm samples back in 1997, but ordered them destroyed if he died since his intent was to father a child if he survived his cancer, which he did not. A judge stated that state law bars the use of stored semen by a surrogate without certain blood tests, which can no longer be done.

UK – According to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology authority, a single woman can name “almost anyone” as a second parent after IVF, man or woman, so long as they agree. This new Act goes into effect on April 6 and the only restrictions will be naming a blood relative or lack of consent by the person. This Act nows opens the doors to lesbians both being named on the birth certificate, which is a big step. Sperm donors cannot be named unless they consent.

Korea – The South District Court in South Korea rejected a lawsuit about the egg donation procedures used in the cloning research of disgraced former Seoul National University researcher Woo Suk Hwang. Two women who had donated eggs through the University brought he lawsuit against the Korean government, MizMedi Hospital and Hangyang University Hospital. The government’s case again Hwang continues.

IrelandThe Supreme Court rejected a woman’s request for the right to make additional submissions in a appeal to determine the fate of three frozen embryos between her and her estranged husband. This woman contentions involve the issue that an embryo is an “unborn.”   The case itself between the couple remains open. 

Subscribe to my blog here