India Fertility Industry Hit with Another Blow & Americans Giving Birth Overseas Using an Egg Donor

In an article that was just posted in India, controvery continues to follow India and its fertility industry.  In this article entitled rightly so, "In the Womb of Controversy," the writer states the following:

"As high drama is being played out in Indian courts over surrogacy issues, the US consulate in Chennai, perhaps worried about the rash of litigations has decided to tighten its visa processing norms, particularly for couples coming to the city for fertility treatment and assisted reproduction.

About a month ago, Vimala (name changed), a US citizen, returning home after delivering a healthy baby boy, was put through a grilling at the US consulate in Chennai when she went to obtain a passport for her new-born. On learning that she had conceived the child with the help of donor eggs (through assisted reproduction by transfer of eggs or oocytes donated by another woman), the consulate declined to recognise her as the biological mother.

"The father's name and mother's name are mentioned in the consular report of birth. This certificate is issued to recognise a US citizen child born outside the country. But the certificate for my son does not list me as the mother. I had to go through a lawyer to process adoption in the US and get the certificate amended to incorporate my name," Vimala said in a communication to her doctor.
The incident triggered protests among a section of fertility experts in Chennai and kicked off a debate on personal privacy and patient confidentiality and the need for laws. "The laws in India and those of countries from where patients come for treatment should be made clear. Our guidelines state that a surrogate mother gives a written undertaking relinquishing all rights over the child, and the same applies to an egg donor as well," pointed out Dr Priya Selvaraj of the Chennai-based GG hospital.

Dr Falguni Bavishi of the Ahmedabad-based Bavishi Fertility Institute insisted that none of her patients, five so far from the US and who delivered through donor eggs, faced 'harassment' at the consulate. "We made it clear to the consulate that the delivery was through egg donation," she said.

With the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill 2008 still in the cans, India's stand on issues relating to surrogacy remains a set of guidelines on paper. Said Dr PM Bhargava, the chief architect of the Bill and former member of National Knowledge Commission: "The draft bill clearly says that if anyone from outside the country wishes to have a child using ART procedure, they have to produce evidence that they can take back the child without problems."

According to Bhargava, one of the architects of the Bill, issues relating to surrogacy have been addressed in the proposed legislation. "We had foreseen problems like this (the legal tussle between divorced Japanese parents and their daughter Manjhi Yamada, born from an Indian surrogate mother and the case of the German couple fighting for citizenship for their twins)," he said.

In the case of the German couple, the Supreme Court has suggested that adoption would be the only way out for their surrogate twins.

Authorities in Germany, which does not recognise surrogacy, were willing to consider their application for a temporary visa for the twins for initiation of adoption process.

US consulate officials declined to comment, merely citing the US Federal statutes governing acquisition of US citizenship by birth abroad to a US citizen parent. Section 7 FAM 1131.4-2 (Citizenship in Artificial and In Vitro Insemination Cases) states that "a child born abroad to a surrogate mother who is the blood mother (that is, who was the egg-donor) and whose father was a US citizen is treated for citizenship purposes as a child born out of wedlock".

But with the ART bill gathering dust and India emerging as a major hub for transcultural surrogacy, the country could well see more cases like that of Jan Balaz and Susan Lohle, the German couple battling to save their surrogate twins from becoming stateless citizens. "

However, women using egg donors and giving birth overseas anywhere need to be aware of this issue, as I have seen it several times in Israel, as well as other countries.  Currently, you will have to do an adoption once you return home to the US if you inform them that an egg donor was used.  Be careful!  And, again this is why it is important to do your research beforehand.

German Surrogate Twins - End of Legal Battle in Sight After 2 years

German Surrogate Twins born in India may finally be able to go home with both of their parents, of which one parent has had to remain in India for almost two years.  Ladies and gentleman, this is a cautionary tale of a couple wanting to be parents so badly that proper legal advice was not obtained beforehand.  You MUST check the laws of where you child is being born AND where you reside.  You cannot and should be taking advice from centers who tell you that things will work out - they have in the past.  You need solid legal guidance that makes certain things will go smoothly, as Murphy's Law never fails. 

 Here is where the case now stands:

"New Delhi, Jan 20 (PTI) The Supreme Court today allowed a German couple to approach the government of Germany to go in for an "inter-country" adoption of the twins born to them from a surrogate Indian woman.

A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly granted the permission after senior counsel L Nageswara Rao, appearing for the couple, sought 10 days time to go through the procedure as it involved certain intricacies.

Appearing on behalf of the Centre, Solicitor General Gopal Subramanaiam assured the apex court that the government "would extend all possible assistance to the petitioner (couple) to facilitate the adoption on humanatarian considation.

On the basis of the undertaking given by the couple and the Centre, the apex court posted the matter for further hearing after a fortnight."

Again, this is not a done deal, but it looks as if an end is in sight.  Good luck to them!

German Twins Born via Surrogacy in India Denied Visas

India Surrogacy & German Twins - the twins born to a surrogate in India approximately two years ago have hit another legal hurdle.   The Indian courts had requested that the German government grant the children temporary visas so that the couple can finally go home from India with their children.  However, news reports now state that Germany has rejected the parents' bid for the visas.  The German government stated that their only real option was to adopt the twins.  A cautionary tale for all when thinking about reproductive tourism.

The twins of a German couple born to an Indian surrogate mother may have a chance to go to Germany – if the couple decides to adopt them. The Supreme Court asked the couple if they would consider adopting the two-year-olds as Germany does not recognise surrogate motherhood.

The apex court Monday asked Jan Balaaz and his wife if they would consider adopting the children after Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium told the court that Germany does not recognise surrogate motherhood, but allows international adoption of children by its citizens.

Subramanium told the bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Asok Ganguly that in the given scenario, the German couple may consider adopting the twins.

He gave the information during hearing of a lawsuit by the government challenging the Gujarat High Court ruling which had directed the government to give Indian passport to the twins born to Jan Balaaz and his wife through a surrogate Indian mother.

The apex court has asked the couple to take their decision and apprise it within two days.

The apex court on Jan 4 asked the central government to try to settle the tangled issue of citizenship of the twins through diplomatic channels. The children were born to Gujarati surrogate mother Marthaben.

The government is opposed to grant an Indian passport to the twins on the ground that it would mean granting them Indian citizenship.

The Gujarat High Court in its order on a lawsuit by the German couple ordered passports for the twins born in January 2008.

The couple came to India in December 2006 in search of a surrogate mother and entered into an agreement with Marthaben, according to which she lost her right over the child after delivery.

On the plea of the German couple last month, the apex court asked the government to provide travel documents to the twins within 48 hours, while asking them to approach the German embassy for visa to the twins.

Surrogate Twins Born in India May Be Granted German Visas

German Surrogate Twins Update - Happy New Year to all!  I am certain that 2010 is going to be a great year for all of us.  And, I am also hoping that this is the year that the case of the German Parents stuck in India is resolved by their country.  Again, another reason to think twice before starting your surrogacy journey in a country such as India. 

New Delhi, Jan 4 (IANS) Germany said Monday it would consider giving visas to German twins born to an Indian surrogate mother, as the Supreme Court asked the Indian government to settle the issue in a fortnight through diplomatic channels.

German Ambassador Thomas Mataussek said his country would consider giving visas to the twins if the Indian government approached it.

“If the Indian government approaches us, we will certainly take note of it. We will not reject it outright,” the German envoy told CNN-IBN when asked whether Germany would reconsider giving visas to the twins if the Indian government gave them one-time passport.

“We have to be very careful. We don’t want to set a precedent,” Mataussek said. “We don’t want to encourage people to go down this path. This is not the way to put children into the world,” the envoy added.

Germany does not recognise surrogacy as a means of parenthood.

An apex court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Asok Ganguly gave the government a fortnight to solve the tangle.

Earlier, Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium apprised the court of the government’s effort to settle the issue. He told the bench that the external affairs ministry is in touch with the German embassy and expects some positive solution to the problem at the earliest.

The government, however, needed some more time to continue its effort, said Subramanium, seeking adjournment of the hearing by a fortnight. The bench adjourned the hearing to Jan 18.

The government had earlier moved the apex court challenging a Gujarat High Court order to issue passports to the twins.

The union government is opposed to the grant of Indian passport to the twins on the ground that it would mean granting them Indian citizenship.

The Gujarat High Court gave its order on a lawsuit of a German couple, Jan Balaz and his wife, seeking passports for their twins who were born in January 2008 to a surrogate Indian mother in Gujarat.

The couple came to India in December 2006 in search of a surrogate mother. They entered into an agreement with Marthaben, according to which she lost her right over the child after delivery.

On the plea of the German couple last month during hearing of the government’s lawsuit, the apex court asked the government to provide travel documents to the twins within 48 hours, and asked the couple to approach the German embassy for visa for the twins.

The bench later on Dec 17 considered the question of granting the twins a one-time Indian passport and asked the German couple to convince the court of its bonafides that they would forgo the children’s Indian citizenship after reaching Germany.

The German couple, accordingly, submitted an undertaking to the court that they would submit the passport to the Indian embassy in Germany after reaching there.

In his affidavit to the apex court, Jan Balaz said earlier too he had submitted his passport to the Indian authorities.

Balaz told the court that “he was ready to deposit a reasonable sum equivalent to the fare of three persons before any court in India to secure the travel of the children, if required”.

Solicitor General Subramanium termed Balaz’s undertaking as “fair”, while seeking more time for the government’s continuing diplomatic efforts to secure citizenship and a state for the stateless twins.

If no decision is taken on the legal status of the twins, the legal community has voiced apprehensions that the two children may end up being stateless citizens.

Last month, a Supreme Court bench of Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly expressed their dilemma.

“Should we treat children born out of surrogacy as commodities?” they asked Jan Balaz and Susan Lohle after they could not tell the court clearly whether the twins could get German citizenship if India did not grant it to them.

Again, Happy New Year to all!

Theresa Erickson

Friday Legal Updates™ - India, Sperm Donation, Israel, Ireland & Virginia

Hello, and welcome to Friday Legal Updates regarding surrogacy, sperm donation, adoption, and other topics of interest.  TGIF!  Short but sweet so enjoy!

1. Florida - Florida Must Recognize Lesbian Adoption from Washington - The answer, an appellate court said earlier today, is that Florida must recognize the adoption.   In other words, when parenthood is established by adoption it is portable.

2. Virginia - Court Gives Full Faith and Credit to NC Custody Order for Gay Dads.  Three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals of Virginia ruled on November 24 that the Fairfax Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court had properly accorded full faith and credit, as required by the U.S. Constitution, to a North Carolina judicial decision awarding primary legal and residential custody of a child to two gay men (who are registered California domestic partners). Still pending before the lower court is a demand by the woman who served as surrogate mother for this child that the North Carolina custody ruling be modified to give her sole custody. One of the judges on the Court of Appeals argued in dissent that the case was not properly before the court for review.

3.  Pennsylvania - Court Orders Child Support from Sperm Donor.  might be the first of its kind in the U.S.  A Superior Court panel last week ordered a Dauphin County judge to establish how much Carl L. Frampton Jr. would have to pay to the birth mother of the 8-year-old boy and 7-year-old girl.  “I’m unaware of any other state appellate court that has found that a child has, simultaneously, three adults who are financially obligated to the child’s support and are also entitled to visitation,” said New York Law School professor Arthur S. Leonard, an expert on sexuality and the law.

4.  Ireland - Gay sperm donor should see his son.  DUBLIN (AP) -- The Irish Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a gay man who donated his sperm to a lesbian couple should be permitted to see his 3-year-old son regularly - in part because Ireland's constitution doesn't recognize the lesbians as a valid family unit.

5. Israel - Israel to Address Gay Surrogacy.  The Israeli Health Ministry is considering to allow gay couples to have a child through surrogate mothers, according to ministry legal adviser Mira Huebner-Harel.  Heubner-Harel announced Monday at an Israel Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology conference that the health ministry is planning to form a committee to update the law.  "The traditional family unit has been changing lately," said Huebner-Harel, reports Haaretz. "A man, woman and child was good, but the trend is changing, and we know of male couples who travel across the sea to have children through surrogates."

6.  India - Surrogacy should be governed by laws, not market: Panel.  Repulsed by commercialisation of surrogacy using reproductive technologies, the Law Commission has proposed a legislation to restrict it to altruistic arrangements and clearly define the rights of commissioning parents, child and the volunteering mother.  It also proposed that surrogacy should be governed by contract among the commissioning parents and the surrogate mother.

Have a great weekend!!

'Reproductive tourism's risks and ethics' by Corey Whelan

Hello, everyone, sorry for the long time between posts, but today is a great one by our own Corey Whelan of the American Fertility Association.  She wrote an excellent article in the Examiner on Reproductive Tourism that I think is a must read:

"Increasingly, we find ourselves living in a global society. Through online communication, and social networking initiatives like twitter and ......  read more here.

Ms. Whelan continue as follows: "This story does not represent an isolated incident.  Family formation and reproductive law attorney,  Theresa Erickson, Esq., has researched programs in places such as India, Thailand, and the Ukraine, where surrogacy is not regulated or supported by law.  Erickson has found that on average the financial costs are usually not much different from those found  in our country, especially when you figure in the risks that must be undertaken legally, particularly in places where the levels of medical technology, safety, and privacy regulation is lower than our own.

Erickson noted that the intended parents in this case thought they had done everything right.  They contacted the appropriate authorities early on in their search.  And yet, neither they, nor their babies, were protected by law.  Also unprotected in this case was their surrogate, or their anonymous Indian egg donor.

In countries where poverty is widespread, inferior medical care, as well as poor nutrition and substandard sanitary conditions are the consistent norm.  Indian women living under these conditions may feel a level of coercion  when considering the financial escape hatch that surrogacy can give them.  An Indian surrogate can expect to earn somewhere between $3,000- $6,000 as a surrogate.  In a country where the per capita income is not quite $500 per year, this is a staggering sum.

Is this exploitation?  Or is it rather a great opportunity for the women now being outsourced to play this role?  Says Prospective Families Donor Agency founder and long time donor advocate, Amy Demma, J.D.  "I have heard colleagues question pre-natal care and other clinical issues. There are risks, and they are serious".    

As there are no official records about surrogates kept in India, we do not know how many women give birth to babies in this way, nor do we know how many failed attempts there are.  We also do not know the quality of medical care that these women will receive after they give birth, or how they will be cared for if medical complications related to the birth occur.

Everything possible should be done  to obtain accurate information about the care your surrogate has and will receive both before,during, and after her pregnancy. "

German Father Continues His Legal Battle - India Surrogacy Update

The case in India over the German couples' twins continues:

"Jan Balaz, father of two twin babies born through surrogacy in Anand, has filed a contempt petition against the passport authorities for non-compliance with the order of the Gujarat High Court.

Balaz recently won a legal case against the Regional Passport Authority in getting the Indian passports of his children returned.

The division bench of the HC comprising Justices K S Radhakrishnan and A S Dave, in a landmark judgment on November 11, had conferred Indian citizenship on the two boys, as their surrogate mother is an Indian.

The court had ordered the passport authorities to return the Indian passports of the two children.

However, when Balaz, a German national, failed to get the passports of his sons back from the authorities till November 16, he filed a contempt petition against them through his lawyer, Dhaval Dave."

Let's all hope this turns out well. 

Friday Legal Updates - India Surrogacy, Stem Cell Research, Surrogacy Abroad & More

Hello, and it is Friday again.  TGIF!  I have included a few interesting, yet informative stories that I think you will find to be thought provoking.  I am also including another link to our upcoming European Conference on Third Party Reproduction in Switzerland.  All are welcome!

Press Release Here and Link on Our Web Page 

Salt Lake City, Utah - the fate of Anthony, who is a boy who has been at the center of a legal battle between his biological mother, a traditional surrogate, his father (intended & biological) and his adoptive parents.  It looks like the justice system has worked this one out for the benefit of Anthony.  What do you think?

New York - New York Stem Cell Research Plan is being bashed relentlessly - many cite that women are being exploited by their eggs being used for research.  The claim is that these eggs are also being fertilized and/or being used for cloning.  Yes, egg donation for any purpose is a serious decision that one should only make after careful deliberation; however, I am on the fence on this one.  Anyone care to educate me on this one?

West Virginia - Lesbian moms can keep foster child - ruling confirmed.  The court was originally against the "untraditional" family; however, it looks as if they are allowing them to maintain custody at this point - although they are unable to adopt as a couple (only one can), as same sex couples are not permitted to do that in WV.  Actual opinion here.

Poland - A thirty two year old Polish woman agreed to be a surrogate mother, changed her mind but feared a legal battle and has since relinquished the child.    This is a scary prospect that we all need to think about before going into any of these arrangements, whether you are the surrogate or the parents.  Know the laws before you proceed!

London/India - As another reminder of preparing before moving forward in this area of family building, a couple from London spent a great deal of time in  India in a lengthy legal battle trying to bring their twins home

Another article listed here also provides those interested in surrogacy overseas to be careful, or you may risk losing your children

Subscribe to my blog at here.  

FRIDAY LEGAL UPDATES - India Surrogacy, Embryos & Divorce, New York & Same Sex Marriages

TGIF, everyone!  Well, not much on the legal front this week that is new news, but here are a few items that I think are newsworthy.  Have a great weekend!

New York - Governor Patterson of New York announced plans that he is set to introduce same-sex marriage legislation into the State Assembly

If the legislation passes, it would make New York the fifth state to legalize same sex-marriage. Similar measures have been approved by courts or lawmakers in Connecticut, Vermont, Massachusetts and Iowa.

"We hope to have this bill passed at the end of June, at the end of the legislative session," said Kellner. "No one wants to bring this to the floor to fail, it would be a huge disaster. We want to make sure that if we bring this to the floor for a vote that it passes."

Nationwide - What Happens to Embryos When a Marriage Dissolves? 

One of the principal legal issues of ART, at the moment, regards the disposition of embryos and whether a couple that uses assisted reproductive technologies should be governed by the laws of contract or by the right to procreate. More specifically, when the couple decides to divorce and cannot agree on the disposition of the embryos that they created through ART, the following questions must be asked: who should have the right to procreate and who should not? Should the couple’s informed consent contract, which was signed before the creation of the embryos, trump the rights of the parties individually after the embryos are already in existence?

India - As I am continually being asked about surrogacy in India and I continue to hear of cases that are not working out as planned, I want to make certain that I provide those couples with the information that I have available.  I am not against surrogacy in India, I merely want to make certain that everyone makes their decision with their eyes wide open. 

Surrogacy & Child Rights

Right of Foreign Homosexuals to Have a Surrogate Child in India: An Analysis

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

FRIDAY LEGAL UPATES - Octuplets, Missouri Donor Legislation & Indian Surrogacy

 

A. Missouri – it appears that the Missouri legislature, headed by Cynthia Davis. In her bill (HB355) she is attempting to ban all anonymous donation (egg and sperm) in Missouri and give all donor-conceived offspring the right to access the donor’s identity at age 21.          In fact, she wants the child’s birth certificate reflect the biological parent’s name (yes, she called the donor a parent) and the donor parent’s name as well. She is not intending to create any legal relationship between donors and the offspring, but the use of the word PARENT is extremely disturbing. What do you think?

 

 

Click Here for the information on this bill HB355

Blog On Bill HB355

B. Octuplet Case – the ASRM is now considering to kick the octuplet doctor out of the society. What affect do you think this will really have? And, with his new case of quadruplets, why do patients keep seeking him out for treatment, especially with his (un)success rates?

Click Here for an Article on this Case in WSJ

Click Here for an Article on this Case in Union Tribune

Click Here for an Article on this Case in New York Post

C. India Surrogacy & a Legal Warning – I read an informative article on a warning to couples/individuals going to India for a surrogate mother. The article discusses what I have guessed all along, that pursuing surrogacy in India is still a risky process because there are still no comprehensive laws covering the practice. I am always concerned when people cut corners when they are in such a vulnerable and desperate state of mind. What do you think?

See article at www.theage.com.au

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq. www.ericksonlaw.net

 

 

 

 

 

Surrogacy in India is not all that it is cracked up to be.....laws appear to be non-existent

After watching the increase in fertility tourism, I have kept a watchful eye on the laws that claim to be in existence.  I found a great article on Gay Dads Australia that I thought was very informative.  I am curious to hear from others who have researched this issue or have had experience in this. I am curious to hear what everyone else has to say on this issue.

"LAWYERS and doctors involved in India's giant fertility industry have warned couples hoping to pursue surrogacy in India that the process is risky because there is no comprehensive law covering the practice.

While surrogacy is legal in India, it is regulated only by guidelines issued by the Indian Council of Medical Research, and many industry participants say these guidelines have been left behind by the rapidly expanding surrogacy industry.

The Age reported on Saturday that about 30 Australian couples were pursuing surrogacy in India. A new Indian surrogacy law is being drafted but those involved say it may not be passed for some time.

Priya Hingorani, a prominent Delhi lawyer who is part of a ministerial committee reviewing the proposed laws, says the absence of a law means couples wanting to use surrogates in India might be vulnerable.

"They are taking a risk because some of the documents that they sign ensuring that the mother will hand over the child might not be deemed legal by the courts," Ms Hingorani said. "They need to be very careful."

She cites the case of a Canadian couple who paid for an Indian surrogate but the mother refused to give up the child after the birth. The case is now before a Delhi court.

Anand Kumar, who runs a fertility clinic and is a member of the expert committee drafting the new law, said tighter regulations were urgently needed.

"It's a bit of a free-for-all at the moment and everyone seems to be doing what they wish," Dr Kumar said.

"There is a possibility of new technologies being misused and there is cause for concern." He could not say when the proposed law would be passed.

Many women's groups in India have expressed concern about the surrogacy system, saying it leaves mothers and babies vulnerable to exploitation.

Ms Hingorani said it was possible the new law could introduce restrictions that might affect foreigners hoping to use surrogate mothers in India.

"I think it is going to be more difficult (after the law is passed)," she said.

India's booming surrogacy industry is estimated to be worth more than $500 million a year.

According to the National Commission for Women, there are about 3000 clinics offering surrogacy services across India.

There were cases where surrogate mothers received as little as 25,000 rupees ($A780), the commission said.

Some of the potential complications associated with international surrogacy were highlighted last year by the case of Baby Manji, a child born to an Indian surrogate mother hired by a Japanese couple.

The couple divorced during the pregnancy and a subsequent legal wrangle left the baby in limbo for more than a month. An Indian court eventually granted custody to the child's 74-year-old grandmother."

In Australia, the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General is reviewing surrogacy regulations, including the issue of Australian couples pursuing surrogacy in developing countries such as India."

Click Here for Original Article
 

Theresa M. Erickson, Esq.
Surrogacy Lawyer & Egg Donation Lawyer 
www.EricksonLaw.net

Subscribe to my blog at: http://www.surrogacyeggdonorblog.com/subscribe.html

India Surrogacy Case Turns Ugly

A beautiful baby girl was recently born in India via a surrogate. For the past few years this has become almost common place in India where people from around the world come to get a surrogate mother for $6250 - $15000. The compensation may seem like too small of a sum by European and American standards, yet this is a fortune for these women in India who mostly come from impoverished backgrounds.

The media frenzy in this case though is not coming from the fact that this is a surrogacy or that the surrogate mother is from India. The frenzy is surrounding the fact that the baby’s biological parents have divorced (prior to her birth) and even though her father is desperately trying to “adopt” his own daughter the Indian government will not allow it because it doesn’t allow single men to adopt children.

Additionally, the surrogate mother does not want to adopt the baby girl, which is completely her right and not what she had been expecting, but the mind boggling issue is the fact that the biological mother, and now ex-wife of the biological father, does not want anything to do with the baby. Therefore, this baby girl is stuck in the hospital in India while her father desperately tries to get the Indian government to allow him to take her home.

This will definitely be and interesting case to watch, hopefully it doesn’t become more heartbreaking than it already is. What are your thoughts?

Full Article can be found here.