San Diego Scientists Make First Human Embryo Clone

It is amazing, yet scary at the same time.  It is incredible how far this technology is taking us!

By Rick Weiss

Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 17, 2008; 6:16 PM

 

Scientists at a California company reported yesterday they had created the first mature cloned human embryos from single skin cells taken from adults, a significant advance toward the goal of growing personalized stem cells for patients suffering from various diseases.

 Remainder of Article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/17/AR2008011700324.html?hpid=topnews

 

Embryo Culture by Beth Kohl

Beth Kohl, author of the new book "Embryo Culture," talks about abortion, faith and her personal struggle with the ethics of assisted reproduction.

By Jennifer Niesslein of Salon.com

Aug. 16, 2007 | After a year of trying to get pregnant in the time-tested manner (intercourse with mate, slow jams and cocktails optional), Beth Kohl discovered that, like 6.1 million of her fellow Americans, she was clinically infertile. So she and her husband, Gary, then 29 and 32 years old, respectively, embarked on a different, but increasingly common, baby-making journey -- one using assisted reproductive technology (ART) to conceive. But along with prenatal vitamins and baby-name books, Kohl found a mess of ethical questions. Why spend so much time and money conceiving bio-kids when many already-born babies could benefit from the same resources? How many embryos is it OK to transfer, given that later a mother might be faced with the decision to selectively reduce (read: abort) one or more of her fetuses? Are IVF kids the same -- healthwise, soulwise -- as naturally conceived children? What about the risk of pregnancy complications, premature birth, and the host of long-term problems that come along with them? Can "man-made" babies ever be reconciled with religious faith? And the biggie: What should would-be parents do with their leftover embryos?
Kohl, who grew up in a conservative Jewish household in suburban Milwaukee, tackled her ethical and reproductive journey with a typically Midwestern work ethic, digging for answers in sources ranging from the Bible to congressional testimonies about forced abortion in China. Now she chronicles her struggle, both with fertility and morality, in a new book, "Embryo Culture: Making Babies in the Twenty-First Century." The bones of "Embryo Culture" is Kohl's own story of two IVF-assisted pregnancies, but she beefs it up with an impressive amount of research on the technical matters and moral questions facing would-be parents, clinicians and the government.
While the subject is serious, her touch is light. Trying to find a metaphor for their infertility, her husband suggests "botanists in the Arctic Circle" -- and Kohl replies: "That is better. Not only does it suggest that my uterus is inhospitable to life, it also manages to hint of my frigidity." She's compassionate, but unsentimental (especially when you compare "Embryo Culture's" language to the banter in infertility chat rooms and blogs. Kohl reports that some women refer to their frozen embryos as "embies" and nickname the eight-cell clusters "Frosty" and "Snow White"). And she never claims to have all the answers. In late July, while her three daughters were at summer camp, Kohl spoke to Salon from her home in Chicago about reproductive rights, "test tube babies" and the unexpected impact IVF has had on her.
When you began IVF treatment 10 years ago, were there any books about infertility treatment available? I think there was a "Fertility for Dummies" book. I didn't buy it for myself because of the title, but somebody who was also going through IVF gave it to me. It was very nuts and bolts -- basically it explained the procedures and the bazillion acronyms. When I poked around on the Internet, I found that there were some clinics that were starting to advertise, but back in those days there weren't any overriding organizations. You could just see the little seedlings of what have now become the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and support organizations like Resolve starting to spring up. Without a network, was it difficult to find a doctor you trusted? I think that, as with any kind of doctor, you click with certain people and not with others. Some doctors are interested in manipulating tiny cells and all of the research that's going on (certainly not federally funded). There are some that want to help otherwise infertile people have children. But you also have people -- like my second doctor, actually -- who feel like a lot of the problem is that woman have been so go-getting that they have changed their cellular structures and have what they see as hysterical infertility. So on one hand, it's nice to have a place where you're not just this number, but on the other hand, you want to feel like you have someone... ...who isn't going to blame you. http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2007/08/16/embryo_qa/

Stem Cell Advance - NC Times

Local firm details stem cell advance
OCEANSIDE ---- A local biotechnology start-up says it has crossed a major hurdle in embryonic stem cells research by growing the cells directly from unfertilized human eggs. If confirmed, the advance could lead to a host of medical advances and at the same time defuse a bitter debate on the ethics of this controversial technology. Because the egg cells were never fertilized, there was no conception and thus no embryo, according to Jeff Krstich, president and chief executive of International Stem Cell Corp. Critics have opposed use of embryonic stems cells, arguing that such research destroys human life. However, research with the Oceanside-based company's stem cells should meet President Bush's requirements for federal funding, Krstich said. The president has banned the use of federal money for research on stem cells created after August of 2001.

Getting around it Evan Snyder, an influential stem cell researcher familiar with Bush's restrictions, agrees with Krstich. "I think it would circumvent the ban," said Snyder, who heads the stem cell research program at the Burnham Institute in La Jolla. That would open the door to funding from the National Institutes of Health, the nation's single biggest funder of medical research. But proving that the Oceanside company's cells work is the big challenge, he said. Embryonic stem cells are the "ancestral" cells that turn into the hundreds of cell types in the human body. They are normally taken from days-old human embryos made by normal fertilization with sperm or by cloning, a technique that creates a genetic duplicate of an organism.

'Remains to be seen' To be used in therapy, stem cells must be transformed, or differentiated, into the needed cell type, then transplanted into the patient. "I just think it remains to be seen how normal they would behave when differentiated, and most importantly when transplanted," Snyder said. Even if this "parthenogenetic" method works, however, some influential organizations, including the Catholic Church, have indicated they would oppose this method as well. Researchers around the world are investigating whether embryonic stem cells can be used to treat diseases and injuries, such as paralysis from spinal cord damage. Krstich said his company's parthenogenetic cells could be used to treat people with diabetes, eye and liver disease by as early as next year.

Booster potential If the company is successful, it will greatly boost San Diego County's visibility as a center of stem cell research. Local companies such as Carlsbad's Invitrogen Corp. and research centers including UC San Diego and the Burnham Institute in La Jolla, have made stem cell research a major priority. Krstich said he relocated the company from Los Angeles to Oceanside a year ago in order to tap into the area's biotech expertise. Lending validity to the claim, the company has published a scientific paper describing its results. The paper appeared in the June 26 issue of Cloning and Stem Cells Journal. The journal is edited by Ian Wilmut, the Scottish scientist whose team created Dolly, the first cloned mammal. The paper said embryonic stem cells were derived six times from unfertilized eggs, creating six "lines" of these stem cells. (Since then, Krstich said, the company has created six more embryonic stem cell lines). "This is the first time to my knowledge that it's been in print," said Larry Goldstein, director of UCSD's stem cell research program. "It's been done in other primates, but not in humans."

Hope for transplants Because they're produced from unfertilized eggs, the company's stem cells closely resemble the genetic makeup of the donor women, Krstich said. This means it should be easier to create replacement tissue for transplants that is not rejected by the recipients. The cells produced by the company's scientists are "pluripotent," which can turn into nearly all of the cell types, according to the paper. In animal studies, the stem cells have been used to make paralyzed rats walk. The cells were transformed into neural tissue and transplanted into the paralyzed rats. The tissue repaired the rats' damaged spinal cords, according to research by Hans Keirstead, a stem cell researcher at UC Irvine. Krstich said the company has produced insulin-producing "islet" cells, retinal cells and liver tissue from the embryonic stem cells, and that animal studies will soon be under way. The company has teamed up with Keirstead for studies on treating retinal disease.

Is it legal? Many scientists believe the embryonic stem cells have a potential for therapies superior to so-called "adult" stem cells, taken from adults or umbilical cord blood. That is because the embryonic stem cells retain more of their ability to turn into different cell types. Adult stem cells have partially transformed into mature cell types. International Stem Cell thinks its workaround is also more effective in making stem cells than other methods. "We take the egg, we chemically treat it ---- that's our patented process ---- it grows to a group of cells called a blastocyst," Krstich said. "We extract the stem cell, and from there, we take the stem cell and we expand it or grow it to a certain size, and then we freeze it. When we thaw it out, we can continue to expand it." Krstich said this method produces one line of embryonic stem cells from every two egg cells, a far higher proportion than in previous methods. Moreover, he said, it doesn't violate Bush's funding restrictions. Opponents say that regardless of whether embryonic stem cells turn out to be better therapy, getting them violates the right to life of embryos as human individuals, because the embryos are destroyed to get the cells. In 2001, President Bush cited that moral concern in restricting federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research to stem cell lines created by August of that year. Previously, no such research had received federal funding.

Congress involved However, a spokesman for the National Institutes of Health, the largest funder of biomedical research, said International Stem Cell's research would fall afoul of a federal law called the "Dickey-Wicker Amendment." The amendment has been added by Congress each year since 1995 to the bill that funds NIH, said the spokesman, Don Ralbovsky. The amendment defines a human embryo as, "any organism, not protected as a human subject . . . that is derived by fertilization, parthenogenesis, cloning or any other means from one or more human gametes or human diploid cells." In 1999, Harriet Rabb, then general counsel of the Department of Health and Human Services, issued a legal opinion that the restriction only applied to funding the process of extracting embryonic stem cells from embryos, not the subsequent use of the embryonic stem cell lines. However, the Bush administration reversed that opinion, and with Bush's decision to restrict funding on his own, the amendment became a non-issue. That could change if the next president decided to end the funding restrictions.

Moral questions The morality of embryonic stem cell research revolves around what makes a human being. Krstich said his company's cells don't have the potential to become human beings and so aren't real embryos. "For most people, we do not think we violate their ethical standards," he said. "Most scientists agree, you cannot create a human being with an egg. You need the egg and the sperm. We only use the egg." Art Caplan, a bioethics expert at the University of Pennsylvania, isn't so sure that will quell the controversy. "Some will say if that thing looks like an embryo, acts like an embryo, is being treated as an embryo, then it is an embryo," said Caplan, who is also on the editorial board of the scientific journal that published the company's research.

Catholics agree The National Catholic Bioethics Center, which reflects official Catholic teaching, takes this position. "Because Dolly the Sheep was made without sperm, this does not imply that she was some kind of being other than a sheep. Similarly, a human embryo made without sperm is not some kind of being other than a human," the center stated on its Web site at: http://www.ncbcenter.org/10Myths.pdf. The company's small scale helps it conserve money, Krstich said. Isolating and culturing embryonic stem cells is not labor-intensive work. It has 15 employees, about seven of those in Oceanside and eight in a subsidiary, Lifeline Cell Technology, in Walkersville, Md. That subsidiary occupies about 4,000 square feet, while the Oceanside headquarters occupies 8,000 square feet. By the end of the year, about 20 employees will be working in Oceanside, Krstich said. In addition, the company is raising money from performing biological work for other companies. Krstich said this reduces the money the company needs to raise from investors. However, being small also works against the publicly traded company, which is not well-known. Shares of International Stem Cell went for $1.00 apiece on Friday, giving it a total stock value of about $40 million. That's minuscule by the standards of public companies The company's stock is traded over the counter under the symbol ISCO.OB. Stories about the production of embryonic stem cells tended to focus on the company's subsidiary. A June 28 Associated Press article failed to mention the parent company. Contact staff writer Bradley J. Fikes at (760) 739-6641 or bfikes@nctimes.com.

Surrogacy Battle Continues in Florida

http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2007/8/3/surrogate_custody_battle_continues.htmlA judge denied Tom and Gwyn Lamitina?s motion Friday for temporary custody?and visitation rights in a custody battle with a surrogate mother in Jacksonville.The Lamitina's, who reside in Seminole County, said they found Stephanie Eckard on a Web site called Surrogate Mothers Online. The Lamitina?s entered into a traditional surrogacy using Eckard's egg.The couple alleges Eckard decided to keep the baby, and began demanding child support, health insurance and additional life insurance for the child.????Eckard's attorney said she told the Lamitina's she wanted to keep the child before it was born.???A final hearing will be held at a later date to determine final custody and how much child support Eckard is entitled to, if any.

Florida Case Update - Traditional Surrogacy Case - Another Media Story

Baby Battle Begins - http://www.wesh.com/news/13787821/detail.html

CHULUOTA, Fla. -- A Seminole County family and a surrogate mother are in a baby battle.

The surrogate won't give up the baby, WESH 2 News reported. The Lamitina family's first child, TJ, 2, brought such joy to his parents that they decided to have a second baby. "The first experience was so great that we thought we have to do this again," Gwyn Lamitina said. Lamitina can't carry a child so she and her husband, Tom, searched for another surrogate mother. But this time, the surrogate won't give them the baby. The nursery in their Chuluota home is ready -- the crib, clothes and Tinkerbell decorations -- all waiting for a baby girl who was born May 9 in Jacksonville. "We're still waiting for her to come home. It's very hard," Lamitina said. The Lamitinas found their surrogate, Stephanie Eckard, online. Soon, an ultrasound showed Eckard was pregnant from a traditional surrogacy -- using her egg and Tom Lamitina's sperm. But soon after they paid Eckard $1,500, the first payment out of $15,000, they caught her smoking. "Her whole attitude changed. It was like: 'Well, I'm pregnant now. This is my baby and it's going to be my way or no way,'" Lamitina said. The Lamitinas accused Eckard of breach of contract for the smoking. They said Eckard responded in an e-mail that smoking was an alternative treatment to cure her migraines, and considered safe by the FDA. From there it got uglier -- the surrogate decided to keep the baby -- and she now wants Tom Lamitina to pay child support. The Lamitinas admit they made many mistakes here. The biggest one is pointed out in a letter from the surrogate's lawyer: there was no contract. At Eckard's home near Jacksonville the sign speaks for her: "No comment." As both sides prepare to head to court, Eckard's attorney had no comment. Florida law treats this situation like an adoption, since the surrogate mother is also the biological mother. That means the mother can change her mind about giving up the baby up to 48 hours after birth. The custody case heads to court Wednesday afternoon.

Update on Florida traditional surrogacy case - case goes to court

Jugde is expected to give a temporary decision in next few days.? See attached news story:http://www.wftv.com/video/13791798/index.html?rss=orlc&psp=news

Audit finds human eggs missing from defunct donor firm - SanLuisObispo.com

Wait a minute....now, the media is assuming alot more here than they should be.? An audit?? Let's not make this official as if we have Ernst Young auditing these files.? See below, and what say you?? - Theresa EricksonThe Associated PressSANTA FE SPRINGS, Calif. --An audit of a now-bankrupt egg donor firm found that thousands of eggs and hundreds of embryos may be missing and unaccounted for, according to a report published Wednesday.Options National Fertility Registry, once one of the nation's largest egg-donor registries, went out of business in 2003 after an egg donor sued the company, alleging a doctor had given her eggs to a couple without her knowledge.The lawsuit prompted the Santa Fe Springs-based company to check every "post-cycle" report it had received from doctors during a 10-year period. The most recent audits of those reports suggest that 2,189 eggs and 596 embryos were unaccounted for, The Orange County Register said.Those cases involve 229 donors and 102 physicians at some of the nation's most prominent infertility clinics, the newspaper said.A spokesman for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine told the newspaper the audit results did not prove wrongdoing by the firm or the fertility doctors who used its eggs but could be the result of poor record-keeping."This is a program that has been in bankruptcy for years, and it's not surprising there might be discrepancies in the record-keeping," said spokesman Sean Tipton. "I don't think there's any indication of wrongdoing by doctors."To donors, the unaccounted-for eggs and embryos mean there might be children somewhere they do not know about.One woman who donated her eggs through Options five times said she doesn't know the fate of four embryos created from her eggs. The woman, who was not fully identified by the Register, knows of twins that were conceived with her eggs but now wonders if other children were conceived using her extra eggs.Options was formed in 1992 and filed for bankruptcy in 2005. At its height, it had 22 employees, contracts with hundreds of doctors and handled 60 to 80 donations per month. It earned about $2,600 for each donation.

UK - Surrogate mother must return boy - BBC News

Appeal judges have ordered a surrogate mother who refused to give up her baby boy to return the child to his father. The baby was conceived after an agreement between a married man from Leeds and a married surrogate mother from Bristol, who has several children.The court heard the father agreed to inseminate the woman on condition that the child she bore would be handed over to him and his wife after birth.But it became clear the mother had no intention of handing the child over. Legal proceedings began at Bristol County Court and Mr Justice Coleridge awarded custody of the boy to the father under the surrogacy agreement.He found the surrogate mother had never intended to hand the child over and was motivated by "a compulsive desire to bear a child or further children".The mother was granted permission to appeal against the order, retaining custody of the boy until the matter was finally settled.On Thursday, Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Toulson, sitting at the Appeal Court, dismissed the mother's claim and opened the way for the father and his family to travel to Bristol to collect the little boy.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_yorkshire/6917815.stm

Can I Get a Little Regulation Here? - What Does Everyone Think?

By Jennifer Lahl, National Director The Center for Bioethics and CultureThis week, the Orange Country Register, ran this headline: Thousands of human eggs may be missing. In the wake of Options National Fertility Registry's legal challenges, which forced them out of business in 2003, recent audits now show that 596 embryos and 2,189 eggs are MIA. One Options egg donor, identified as "Elizabeth", apparently donated eggs to one infertile couple, only to later learn her eggs were given to another couple without her permission or knowledge. "The second couple was initially denied use of the eggs, but was later permitted to use them as part of a legal settlement." Women who donated their eggs through Options are now being asked to check their contracts to see if they are one of the egg donations cycles with suspected irregularities. Suspected irregularities sounds like a lawyered up way of saying we really messed up and now we need to do major damage control.Of course, none of this is new news. People involved in a major fraud case from 1995, with fertility doctors at the University of California, at Irvine, have just settled for $23.2 million in damages. "The greatest injury, and thus the greatest payouts, resulted after one woman's eggs were taken without her consent, and then given to another woman who ultimately gave birth to a child."And even outside the U.S. abuse exists. In 2000, "two of Israel's most senior infertility specialists have been put under police investigation for allegedly overstimulating the ovaries of patients in order to produce large numbers of ova, which they then 'sold' for treating infertile women in Israel and abroad."There is also the famous IVF mix-up case where a white couple gave birth to black twins. Dr. Sammy Lee, of a London hospital, explains that we need not be alarmed as human error happens. There have been several other cases of couples giving birth to the wrong children. Typically these are caught though, because the babies born have different skin color than the parents! How many others are born that go unnoticed? Wrong embryos being implanted. Women's eggs and men's sperm getting mixed up along the way. Eggs taken without permission and given or sold to someone else. And afterwards, the courts are left to clean up the mess. Whose baby is this? Who has legal rights and obligations? Who decides?My colleague, Josephine Quintavalle, with Comment on Reproductive Ethics, (CORE) is always quick to remind me, as far as regulation goes-- Be careful what you ask for! In the U.K. for instance, IVF is regulated by the Human Fertilization Embryo Authority (HFEA) but the regulated IVF industry in the U.K. has brought us post-menopausal women giving birth, payment to women for their eggs, and the famous 'egg sharing' program which offers IVF discounts to poor women in exchange for their eggs for cloning research.Since the IVF industry won't self-regulate, perhaps it is time to step in and manage them. I am not asking for meaningless regulation which would be just a slap on the hand or nothing more than suggested guidelines. I'm ready for something with teeth that includes a clear plan for enforcement with strict penalties attached for those who violate.http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/16311

WA - push to change surrogacy laws - Perth News

By Nick Taylor

July 25, 2007 01:00pm

FEDERAL Attorney-General Philip Ruddock should remove legal obstacles that stop infertile couples using surrogacy to have a baby, the State Government says.

http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,22132435-948,00.html

Miracle Birth - a story of sacrifice and survival

(CBS4) WESTON A true story of survival and sacrifice ends with the gift of life, not once but twice.Ayal and Caryn Chomsky live in Weston with their 7-month old twins but the journey to parenthood did not come easily because the twins did not come out of their mother, they came out of their grandmother.That?s because Caryn Chomsky was diagnosed with cervical cancer when she was just 25 years old.?When I found out I had cancer my first thought was, ?Oh my God I can't have kids?,? Caryn Chomsky told CBS4?S Carey Codd.Her husband, Ayal, was shocked when he first heard the news. ?It's the last thing you would ever think that your 25 year old, beautiful, healthy wife would have cancer,? Ayal told Codd.While Caryn would survive, she could not have children.The couple preserved Caryn?s eggs so they could someday have a surrogate carry their kids.That?s when Caryn?s mother stepped in and gave birth to the idea that she should be the surrogate. Ann Stolper was 59 years old.?I really wanted them to have their own children and I thought why can't I do it,? said Stolper.At first Caryn thought her mom was nuts, then the idea took hold and the Chomsky's did in vitro fertilization.Nine months later, and after a lot of fretting and worrying, little Maya and Etai Chomsky came into the world.?It was wonderful to have her carry my children. I couldn't have asked for anyone else to carry my children,? said Caryn.Ann has even offered to have another child for her daughter and son-in-law but for now, the Chomsky's say they are thrilled to have these two healthy babies and they?re happy Caryn is cancer free.The Chomsky's have become advocates for the use of Gardasil, the vaccine for HPV or the Human Papillomavirus.The Chomsky's believe the vaccine could have prevented Caryn's cancer.They along with their doctor believe the vaccine should be widely used by girls and women across the country.Dr. Rebecca Stern told CBS4 News, ?I've seen a significant increase in the detection of HPV. I really think the vaccination is a medical breakthrough."Legislators in Florida tried to make the vaccine mandatory but that effort failed.Some in the legislature argued the vaccine could promote sexual activity among girls and young women.http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_201114822.html

Article entitled "Thousands of eggs may be missing"

I would like everyone to read this article, and comment on how you feel about it. I am concerned with the inaccuracies, and I will be writing a press release to address this.

The Orange County Register by Teri Sforza
More than 100 fertility doctors in dozens of states may have brokered unauthorized transfers of human eggs, according to the bankruptcy court filing of a local company and its former records supervisor. Options National Fertility Registry was forced out of business in 2003 after getting caught up in a tangle of lawsuits in Texas, the court filing says. An Options donor, identified only as "Elizabeth," had contracted to donate her eggs to one infertile couple, and later learned that the doctor gave some of her eggs to a second couple without her knowledge, permission or consent, the bankruptcy documents say. Elizabeth sued, and settled with the doctor out of court. In the wake of this revelation, Options, of Santa Fe Springs, combed through every "post-cycle" report it received from doctors over a dozen years of business. Those reports detail how many eggs each donor produced, and what became of those eggs. Options initially found that 83 egg donation arrangements contained discrepancies and irregularities in the number of eggs retrieved, fertilized, transferred, frozen and/or disposed of. "To put it simply, there are many eggs and embryos that are unaccounted for," the bankruptcy petition says. Some doctors refused to provide post-cycle reports at all, said Melinda Lansford, Options' medical records supervisor for six years. More recent audits of Options' records suggest that there were 596 embryos, and 2,189 eggs, unaccounted for. More than 300 post-cycle reports had irregularities, involving 80 medical facilities, 102 physicians and 229 donors. "I wanted to help people have children, and I believed that this whole business was about the same thing," Lansford said. Lansford agreed to speak on the record Saturday after years of keeping a low profile because she has recently been diagnosed with an aggressive form of thyroid cancer. "I consider it a wake-up call," she said. "This needs to be known. I couldn't go on knowing that these women weren't aware of what's going on, and that the children resulting from these arrangements would have no link to their genetic roots." Options owner Teri Royal referred questions to her attorney, who could not be reached for comment late Saturday. The situation bears an eerie resemblance to the fertility fraud scandal at UC Irvine a dozen years ago. Then, doctors took eggs from fertility patients without their permission, and gave those eggs to other women, at least a dozen of whom later gave birth. "If it's true, it certainly would be a major scandal," said Arthur Caplan, chair of the department of medical ethics and director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. "They call these egg donations, but these are egg sales. But even when you agree to sell your eggs, you're agreeing to a specific purpose and a specific couple. As we saw with the UCI problems, people might have reasons for not making their eggs available to certain other people. They do have the right to control the disposition of their eggs. "It's not the same as stealing a whole embryo to make a baby," he said. "But you're supposed to know where things are going and it's absolutely important that the system can account for it and make sure it goes where it's supposed to go. If doctors are making deals on the side and moving them around ? for teaching, research purposes, whatever ? that is a violation of informed consent." Criminal laws changed in the wake of the UCI scandal, but they don't apply here. "The laws that passed say, 'Don't steal embryos.' They don't apply to eggs. There is no explicit law," Caplan said. Options was once one of the nation's largest egg-donor registries, a service linking egg donors with infertility patients from coast to coast. Options had 22 employees, contracts with more than 500 doctors all over the country, and handled 60 to 80 donations per month. The company earned about $2,600 for each donation. It was formed in 1992 and paid close attention to the UCI scandal in 1995, making doctors sign contracts acknowledging the exclusivity of the arrangement during each donor cycle. According to a civil lawsuits filed in Harris County, Texas, Dr. Michael Allon of Texas did not pay those contracts much attention. The suit says Howard McBride and Novella Rhodes McBride got Elizabeth's eggs without Elizabeth's knowledge. They became pregnant with twins, miscarried, and sued Allon, Options and others after they were refused access to the remaining frozen embryos, which had been fertilized with Howard McBride's sperm. Allon told the McBrides that the patients who had contracted with Elizabeth for an egg donation ? identified as "Mr. and Mrs. Doe" ? didn't have the money to complete the transaction, the suit says. Allon suggested that the McBrides split the cost of Elizabeth's cycle, and the resulting eggs, with the Does. "Dr. Allon assured Ms. Rhodes-McBride that it was legal and that physicians are actually encouraged to promote egg sharing among patients," the suit says. In a cross-claim, Options said that this scandal harmed its reputation and led to its ultimate destruction. It filed for bankruptcy in October 2005. Audits of its records done since the bankruptcy filing suggest that the scandal is even larger than originally believed, involving 102 doctors and more than 500 unaccounted-for eggs. "It's inconceivable to me that any doctor would do something like this after the UCI scandal," said Lansford, Options' records supervisor. "Nobody realized it wasn't an isolated incident, that it could be an industry-wide practice. It has happened once (with Allon), and appears to have happened several more times." Lansford said she didn't recognize the discrepancies in the records at the time. "I was no expert," she said. "I'm not qualified to tell what is off and what is not." Her job was to collect and file the post-cycle reports, detailing what happened to the donors' eggs and embryos. The purpose was not to evaluate or double-check doctors' work, but simply to keep track of how donors responded to treatment, and who might be called on for more donations later. There could be many reasons why the numbers would be off, she said. Some of the eggs harvested may have been unusable or damaged. Some may have failed to divide after being fertilized. Some of the fertilized eggs may have stopped dividing. But, in some of the post-cycle reports, the difference between the number of eggs retrieved and the number of embryos created is as high as 50 percent. "The fact that they didn't add up poses questions," she said. One post-cycle report, for example, lists the number of eggs retrieved as nine, the number of eggs fertilized as two, the number of embryos transferred as two and the number of embryos frozen as two. How there could be four embryos ? two transferred and two frozen - when only two eggs were fertilized, is one of the unanswered questions. Lansford's hope is that explicit laws will be enacted to make unauthorized egg transfers a crime, and urges others with knowledge of these to come forward. "My concern is not just about Options, but about all the other donors from other agencies who thought they were working with just one couple. How can we ever know how many children are out there?" Lansford said. "I'm afraid of repercussion. But legislation needs to be written to protect donors and the children. Nobody seems to care. Nobody wants to get involved. I had to say something. Somebody has to do it." Egg irregularities The following are donor numbers of women who donated eggs through OPTIONS National Fertility Registry, whose cycles had suspected irregularities. Women should check their contracts; if their number is on the list, they should request copies of their medical records. http://www.ocregister.com/news/eggs-options-doctors-1782305-embryos-egg

New reproductive techniques require a new morality

Emma Crichton-Miller reviews Everything Conceivable: How Assisted Reproduction is Changing Men, Women and the World by Liza Mundy

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/06/28/bomun124.xml

In the epilogue of this thought-provoking book, Liza Mundy writes of a friend seeing, on holiday on a New Jersey beach, a plane flying overhead. Stretched out behind trailed a banner reading: 'WOMEN EARN $8000 AGE 20-30 888-968 EGGS'. With the same brash commercial energy that powers so much of the United States economy, breeding possibility from desire, the plane was soliciting human eggs.

For most of human history these microscopic cells have required jealous protection, their awesome potential as much a burden as a joy. Today they have become one of modern America's most hotly pursued commodities. And here they were being touted for like so much valuable scrap. As Mundy recalls, 'When my friend told me about this, I experienced a moment of clarity, when it was possible to look a reproductive phenomenon straight in the eye and say: Well, this does not seem like a good thing.'

This is a rare and well-earned moment of moral decision in a book that mostly eschews judgement in favour of exhaustive exploration of one of the biggest social and scientific changes of the past 50 years. The title of the book makes a grand claim. It argues that the extraordinary achievements of reproductive science, culminating in the much-publicised successes of IVF, of surrogacy and of sperm and egg donation, are changing irrevocably both society and human nature.

Mundy goes on to argue that in making possible families previously thought impossible (families with menopausal mothers or with two gay parents), or even simply very unlikely (families of fathers with no sperm count or of surviving quins), there is as much to worry about as to celebrate. Moreover, the book insists that far from affecting only a tiny minority of hugely wealthy North Americans, these changes are set to recur and replicate their effects across the world. Infertility, estimated to afflict 80 million people worldwide, is likely only to rise, encouraged as it is as much by poverty and pollution as by late motherhood; meanwhile affluence and science will continue to seek solutions.

Liza Mundy is a highly respected journalist on the Washington Post and in this timely book, she not only documents how inspired scientists have revolutionised how some of us conceive, and indeed conceive of conception, but she does so from every possible angle. What brings this book alive, however, are the compassionately realised personal stories.

We meet Laura and Hector Ramirez, who are trying to define a role in their family for Kendra Vanderipe, the donor of the eggs which have become their triplet sons. We meet Gretchen Lee and Evie Leder, a lesbian couple with their daughter, Rose, and Doug Okun and Eric Ethington with their twin daughters, Sophia and Elizabeth. We hear a string of SMCs - single mothers by choice - recall the reasoning that led them to the sperm bank. These are all stories to celebrate, they show how technology can free human beings from flaws and enable fundamental happiness. As a mother herself, Mundy understands the longing for and deep joy of parenthood.

But just about midway through the book, the marvellous upwards trajectory falters and then collapses in chaos and distress. At first Mundy turns the spotlight from the parents, revelling in their fulfilled parenthood, to the children of donor sperm and eggs, to ask what their rights and feelings might be. We learn that Doug and Eric's wonderfully generous surrogate mother almost died and required an emergency hysterectomy in giving birth to their twins.

Then Mundy meets Melissa and Brett Middleton, who could only afford one cycle of IVF, gambled with four implanted embryos and ended up with three very fragile triplets; and Tammy and Steve LaMantia, who opted to implant three not two embryos and lost all three at birth. As Mundy asks, 'What map exists for this uncharted territory of the heart?'

Just as Mundy has been unflinching in asking all the difficult questions, so at this point she faces all the difficult facts. She witnesses horrifying but potentially life-saving operations to 'delete' dangerously surplus foetuses in the womb; she considers the fate of the 400,000 (so far) excess frozen embryos in the United States alone; she ponders the consequences for poor single women of the hunger that stem-cell research may create for human eggs; she worries about the betrayal of traditional parenthood involved in substituting control and choice for chance and unconditional love; above all, she is revolted by the rampant commercialisation that can lead unscrupulous doctors and demanding would-be parents to ignore the huge physical, psychological and moral effects of these life-creating technologies.

In a sense what Mundy traces is the story that has increasingly become the core story for her, and indeed my, generation of women: how the battle to achieve freedom to control conception gave way to a battle to conceive. Coming to maturity around 1978, the year that Louise Brown, the first test-tube baby, was born, Mundy has seen her contemporaries experience divorce, enforced singleness and infertility, as well as enjoy the benefits of stimulating careers and the redemptive rise of assisted reproduction. She is only too aware that this mid-term report can offer no final judgements about the long-term value of assisted reproductive technologies.

We have only begun to address the social and evolutionary implications of these techniques and to feel their moral and psychological impact. This book, enlivened by Mundy's generous sympathy and agile moral intelligence, is a major contribution to the debate.

Local fertility specialist and researcher passionate about helping build families

By VINCE HEALD, Special to the Daily Transcript http://www.sddt.com/Search/article.cfm?SourceCode=20070622crg

Wood assembled that team, principally with Chief Scientific Officer Andrew French, Ph.D., and thus Stemagen Inc., a privately funded embryonic stem cell research company, was born.


Heald is principal of Beck Ellman Heald. Reproductive Sciences Center: www.fertile.com Stemagen: www.stemagen.com

Third-party reproduction demands specialization

Friday, June 22, 2007
If you are a family law attorney, physician or health care practitioner dealing with someone considering utilizing third-party reproduction and IVF to create a family, you must make certain that they are represented by an attorney that concentrates exclusively in this area and who has the experience to back up their advice. More specifically, several recent court cases have created a media storm, such as the Roman v. Roman case in the state of Texas where the now divorced couple is fighting over their frozen embryos. Whatever the outcome in this matter, these cases suggest a need to review the sufficiency of existing protocols, consents and documentation in light of the current uncertainties in the law in most states. The possibility of facing these issues in your own practice makes the proper advice and education so important. Together, we must promote that third-party reproduction and IVF are not adventures that one travels alone; instead, it should be seen as a journey that must be properly planned out before any cycle commences. Contact Theresa M. Erickson directly at (858) 748-4133 or terickson@ericksonlaw.net for a free consultation. Submitted by Theresa M. Erickson of Erickson Law, a Professional Law Corporation

Ca. Assembly Eyes Permission for HIV+ Donors to Conceive

The California Assembly?s Health Committee passed a bill last week to allow women to use medical techniques to conceive using the sperm of an HIV-positive prospective father without risk of transmitting the virus that causes AIDS.Gay.com reported last Thursday that under current California law, prospective fathers who are HIV positive may not use assisted reproduction technology to enable a female partner to conceive.But modern technology allows the sperm from HIV positive men to be rendered safe and virus-free."All families deserve access to the tools that reproductive science has to offer," said Democratic Sen. Carole Migden, who introduced the bill, in a written statement."In this case, California law needs to catch up with technology because, whether inadvertent or not, it discriminates against HIV-positive men" Midgen continued. "My legislation will ensure equal reproductive rights for all women, regardless of their partners? HIV status."The provision that prevents women from receiving sperm from HIV positive men is part of a larger law that bans the use of organs, tissues, and other biological material from HIV infected donors. Aside from Delaware, California is the only state that bans the practice of using virus-stripped sperm for conception, although the method has been available for a decade.California and Delaware are the only states that bar the procedure, which has been available for 10 years.The Gay.com story cited Migden?s office as saying that numerous studies from America and abroad confirm that modern assisted reproduction technologies are safe for use, demonstrating no transmission of HIV from donor to recipient with use of the modern techniques.In the article, University of California, San Francisco?s Dr. Deborah Cohan cited the more than 4,000 instances of women receiving sperm from HIV positive men via the modern techniques, resulting in 700 births; not a single instance of HIV transmission has occurred either to the mother or the baby.Dr. Cohan, who is the Medical Director of the Bay Area Perinatal AIDS Center, said, "I am thrilled at the prospect of being able to offer my patients a safe method of conceiving."Added Dr. Cohan, "With potent antiretroviral therapy now available, HIV-infected individuals live increasingly healthy and normal lives and many want to have families. With this important bill, we will be able to offer them a safe way of building healthy families."http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=glbt&sc2=news&sc3=&id=21215

Comparison Of PGD And IVF Treatments Show That Children Born Equally Healthy After Both Procedures

Children born after embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) do not show any more major malformations than those born after artificial reproduction technologies (ART) without PGD, as reported at the annual conference of the European Society of Human Genetics today. Professor Ingeborg Liebaers, from the Research Centre for Reproductive Genetics, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, says that the results of her study of 583 children born after PGD was reassuring.PGD is a new option for couples at risk of transmitting genetic diseases. Instead of carrying out a prenatal diagnosis followed by a termination of pregnancy, in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (where a sperm is injected directly into an egg) is performed, followed by genetic testing of the embryos. Only unaffected embryos are subsequently transferred to the womb."Because embryos are biopsied in PGD procedures, and this constitutes an additional manipulation of a delicate organism, we set out to study whether this had any effect on the health of children who were born as a result of this procedure", says Professor Liebaers. The scientists first collected data on the pregnancies by giving questionnaires to patients on the day of the embryo transfer. Additional questionnaires were sent during pregnancy, at delivery, and later on to the patients, their gynaecologists, and paediatricians. Children were examined at 2 months and 2 years old."After embryo transfer, 563 children of the 583 were liveborn, 20 were stillborn, and 9 died neonatally. It seems that the perinatal death rate is higher, especially in multiple pregnancies, then in IVF and ICSi children. We need to further investigate these perinatal death rates," says Professor Liebaers, "but we were encouraged to find that the major malformation rate was only 3.6%, or no higher than that which is found in children born after conventional IVF and ICSI."The average length of the pregnancies of singleton births was 38.8 weeks and the mean birthweight 3.268 kg, comparable to those of IVF and ICSI children, she says."The study is the first of a large series of PGD children from one centre", Professor Liebaers will tell the conference, "and we will be carrying out further follow-up as these children grow older. But we feel that results to date are reassuring; it is good to know that a procedure that can offer patients hope of having a baby unaffected by serious disease is also safe in the longer-term."http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=74530

2-for-1 is no baby bargain, doctors say - MSNBC

For couples struggling to conceive a child, news of becoming pregnant with multiples following infertility treatment is often cause for celebration. Some even wish for it.

"I hear that frequently: I want twins. I don't want to pay for this again. The two-birds-with-one-stone thing," says Dr. Robert Stillman, medical director of Shady Grove Fertility Center in Washington, D.C., and a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Georgetown University School of Medicine. They see twins in a stroller at Starbucks and think, I've been at this for four years. Why not just do this two at a time?

But the truth is that having multiples, even twins, comes with significant health risks, and the cost of their care can be staggering.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17937811/

Elle Article - See Link for complete article

DANI SHAPIRO SPARED NO EFFORT OR EXPENSE IN HER QUEST TO FIND THE PERFECT EGG DONOR?ONE WITH HER INTELLECT, HER LOOKS, EVEN HER FEELINGS. BUT THEN THEY MET, AND SHE REALIZED THAT EVEN THE FINEST REPRODUCTIONS STILL AREN'T THE REAL THINGThe palm-filled lobby of Shutters on the Beach, an upscale hotel perched on the edge of the Pacific Ocean in Santa Monica, is a good spot for a blind date. With overstuffed chairs and sofas grouped around low coffee tables, and fireplaces blazing in the middle of a hot California afternoon, Shutters is a place where you can sit and talk, and no one will notice you or care.I've chosen a table near some drinking Europeans, with a clear view across the lobby to the front doors. I'm early, anxious. A Fred Segal shopping bag containing a gaily wrapped gift is at my feet. Only a few people in the world know I'm here. It feels as if I'm waiting to do something illicit?something involving sex or drugs. Which, in a way, I suppose I am.A tall blond in a white pantsuit walks in, preceded by two chihuahuas straining on their leashes. Not her. A trio of young women in jeans and tailored jackets?Hollywood development-girl types?scan the room for a table. Not her, not her, not her.Finally?at exactly three-thirty, our appointed time?a slight woman in jeans, a pink T-shirt, and a blazer walks into the lobby. I recognize her instantly. She's looking for me, too, though I have the advantage. She hasn't seen my photograph. She has no idea what I look like, though she'd be correct in assuming that I am probably similar to her in build and coloring?an older version.http://www.elle.com/featurefullstory/10235/there-is-no-me-without-you.html

U.S. women crossing globe for fertility help

In August of 2005, Shauna Anderson treated herself to a vacation of sorts: three weeks in Cape Town, South Africa, more than 10,000 miles from her home just outside Seattle, for a little respite, a safari ? and a round of in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Not your typical vacation itinerary, but one that?s becoming increasingly popular among American women struggling with infertility issues and overwhelmed by the cost of IVF in the United States. By traveling abroad for fertility procedures, women can pay thousands of dollars less than what they?d spend at home.

But some experts caution women to look carefully at the standards, practices and success rates of foreign clinics, especially those that are located in poorer countries and offer donor eggs. By going overseas, women may be paying for a procedure that has a lower chance of success than in the U.S. And there?s been at least one reported case of a Romanian clinic recruiting illiterate donors and failing to take appropriate measures to make sure that those donors were giving fully informed consent.

Anderson, now 35, says the path that took her beyond borders began four years ago when she decided to become a single mom and underwent inseminations using sperm from an anonymous donor.

Crossing the line ?Cycle after cycle, I kept having negative results on the pregnancy test,? she says. ?Then I started to add drugs to the protocol, and that didn?t work. I had a couple of surgical procedures to make sure the pipes were clean, and that didn?t help. Before I knew it, I?d crossed the line into IVF.?

And a new realm of financial commitment. Anderson ?s insurance would cover only the diagnosis of infertility, not any treatments, so she paid out of pocket for two IVF procedures in Seattle. Neither produced a pregnancy. By that point, she was down more than $15,000 ? still, a drop in the bucket compared to what some U.S. women end up paying. The average cost of IVF in the U.S. is currently about $12,000 per cycle, according to Pamela Madsen, executive director and founder of the American Fertility Association, a patient education and advocacy group.

Anderson first got the idea to investigate IVF abroad after reading an article on the rise of medical tourism for procedures such as hip replacement and cataract surgery. She was inspired to investigate South Africa, among other countries, as she?d been following the blog of a South African woman who?d been navigating her own fertility problems.

After two weeks of Internet research and several late-night phone calls to clinics around the world ? seeking information on everything from success rates to lab controls to sanitation standards to their willingness to treat a single woman ? she chose a clinic in Cape Town, booked a flight and headed south.

The cost of her three-week IVF vacation? About $6,400, including airfare and hotel stay. Anderson?s IVF ? including drugs, procedures, and lab and hospital fees ? accounted for just $3,600 of that total.?

While there are no overall statistics collected on overseas IVF, the Cape Fertility Clinic, where Anderson underwent her IVF, reports 10 to 15 patients from the U.S. per month so far in 2007, roughly double the numbers it saw in 2006. And last month?s media reports on the 60-year-old New Jersey woman who gave birth to twins, produced after a visit to a South African fertility clinic specializing in older patients, will likely serve to increase those numbers ? especially among women who seek to have children later in life.

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) hasn?t issued an official stance on this trend, but for women who are looking into the overseas option, Dr. David Adamson, the fertility organization?s president-elect, warns them to be aware of what they may be giving up ? namely the oversight and standards that apply to IVF clinics in the U.S.

The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention validates and reports clinic success rates, for instance, and the Food and Drug Administration requires registration of all clinics providing sperm and egg donation services.

Adamson also points to the success rates for IVF in the U.S., which, he says, are quite high, compared to other countries in the world.

Shopping for donor eggs In addition to less costly IVF, the prospect of cheaper donor eggs is also sending American women abroad. In the U.S., introducing donor eggs to the equation typically means adding thousands of dollars to the cost of IVF, in the form of donor and agency fees and costs associated with donor screening (for genetic issues, STDs, etc.) and care.

That?s what Fran, who asked that her last name not be used, discovered as she contemplated her first IVF cycle earlier this year. Unable to conceive after a year of trying, the 44-year-old began researching IVF at clinics near her home in Massachusetts. Like Anderson, Fran and her husband were faced with paying for the treatment out of pocket, as their insurance wouldn?t cover it due to Fran?s age. Doubting that she?d have success with her own, Fran and her husband decided to use donor eggs, but after researching the local options, she says they learned they could expect to pay about $30,000.

Through a friend of a friend, Fran heard about a clinic in the Czech Republic. Naturally, she had questions. ?I didn?t want to be on someone?s couch in an alley,? she says. She contacted ivfvacation.com, a Web site run by an Ohio-based husband-and-wife team that helps American women arrange and take IVF vacations to the Czech Republic. Their services include helping women fill out medical questionnaires prior to departure, booking accommodations and car rentals, planning tours and arranging translating services for clinic appointments.

They referred Fran to past clients and pointed her toward an Internet bulletin board, where she found postings about the agency and the clinic it uses, the Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology in Zlin. The facility, about three and a half hours from Prague, reports having treated 40 women from the U.S. last year, and, on average, seven to 10 American women each month in 2007.

There is no international body regulating fertility clinics on issues such as donor recruitment practices and safety standards. In the European Union, a law was passed last year setting standards for the donation, testing, storage and so on of human cells and tissues; however, it?s up to individual member countries to regulate compliance. IVF patients who, like Fran and Anderson, choose to go abroad often rely on the Internet to hunt for information on the services and standards of individual clinics outside their home countries.

Guido Pennings, a professor of ethics and bioethics at Ghent University in Belgium and co-coordinator of the Task Force on Ethics and Law of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), cautions that women researching their options this way should be careful. Success rates published on a clinic?s Web site, for example, may not be accurate. If a country doesn?t have a central registry that monitors fertility clinics? reported rates, ?there?s no way they can prove it to you,? he warns. And while a country may have laws seeking to regulate clinics in these and other matters, Pennings says, ?You can have a good law, but if no one checks it, you won?t know if clinics are following the rules or not. That is the case in a lot of European countries.?

Pennings also notes concerns over donor consent in poor countries, such as the case in Romania where illiterate donors were reportedly recruited. He warns that the poorer the country, the greater the risk of this sort of practice.

The AFA?s Madsen echoes Pennings? concerns regarding reported success rates. She advises women looking at clinics abroad to check to see if rates are verified by a government body or a private auditor. In addition, she encourages women to ask, ??Are rates divided by age, or do they give one number? ? which means there could be patients under 25, and you are a 37-year-old woman.?

There?s also the question of safety.

Dr. John Frattarelli, a reproductive endocrinologist, obstetrician and gynecologist at Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, says he?s treated two patients who?ve suffered mild ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) as a result of overseas IVF. However, he notes, ?That is not a knock on the provider performing the services. It?s a complication that any of us get.?

The problem, he says, is that OHSS can increase the risk of blood clots, commonly in the legs ? already a concern for anyone on a long airplane flight. Symptoms can also include fluid in the abdomen or lungs, a dangerous situation if a woman is in a country where she can?t get adequate health care.

For women like Fran who are seeking an egg donor, Frattarelli calls out another potential issue: the adequacy of donor screening for genetic and other issues. ?In the U.S., donors are screened very thoroughly,? he says. ?Other countries don?t necessarily have that.?

Do your homework He advises women to do their homework when considering a clinic abroad. ?Look at the credentials of the hospital,? he says.

After researching online the staff of the Zlin clinic and corresponding with several American women who?d been there, Fran decided to sign up for a trip to the Czech Republic. Next, it came time to pick her donor.

According to Marcela Fite, one of the co-proprietors behind ivfvacation.com, many donors at the Zlin clinic are college-educated (Zlin is a university town), and, at a minimum, must have completed high school. According to the clinic, donors undergo genetic and STD screening and receive no more than $715, for travel expenses and discomfort associated with ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval. (Legally, donors in the Czech Republic cannot be compensated for the actual eggs produced. According to the Czech Statistics Office, the average monthly wage in the Czech Republic is about $970.)

For Fran and her husband, the most important criteria was that their donor be healthy and have healthy children of her own or have produced a pregnancy through donation. Following that, says Fran, she wanted her donor to be under 30, have hair color and eye color similar to hers and have a college degree.

In April, Fran and her husband traveled to the Czech Republic. Two weeks and about $12,500 later ? including the cost of donor eggs, drugs and procedures, as well as airfare, transportation, food and accommodation for two ? she?d been implanted with three embryos. (According to ivfvacation.com, couples using donor eggs can usually expect to pay about $7,300, excluding airfare; women using their own eggs typically pay $5,700.)

Finally, two weeks later, Fran learned she was pregnant. She's due in January.

Anderson's trip was less fruitful. The procedure in Cape Town didn?t produce a pregnancy.

No regrets After returning home, Anderson decided to give up on using her own eggs, and ultimately conceived her twin daughters, now a year old, using donated frozen embryos. (The frozen embryo transfer, which doesn?t require ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval, cost $4,555.) Nonetheless, Anderson says she doesn?t regret going to South Africa.

?It was an incredible experience,? she says. ?You have this nice pleasantness of a vacation wrapped around this very stressful situation. And you get to do it a little more privately, instead of being surrounded by co-workers and friends, pretending it?s your everyday life ? and during an IVF cycle, it never is.?

Fran agrees. IVF treatment is so stressful. You become so focused on it: When?s your next appointment? What day is it in your cycle? Being overseas really gave us the opportunity to have hours and hours not to think about it. We were renting the car, trying to read the road signs, meeting new people, seeing places ... there was so much time we were just tourists.?

?We had a vacation,? she adds. ?Aside from everything else.?

M. Susan Wilson is a Seattle-based freelance writer and editor.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19100571/page/2/

Survey belies tales of donor egg market gone awry - Reuters UK

By Anne HardingNEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Media reports of an out-of-control market for human eggs fueled by desperate couples willing to pay large sums are exaggerated, results of a survey suggest.The average donor compensation for 191 fertility clinics surveyed nationwide was $4,217, well within the $5,000 limit established by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) in 2000, Sharon N. Covington of the Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center in Rockville, Maryland and Dr. William E. Gibbons of the Women's Center for Reproductive Medicine in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, found."I think that's what gets headlines is to look at an industry that's kind of out of control and gone awry, and we don't believe that that's the case," Covington, who conducted the survey for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), told Reuters Health."One of the purposes of a study like this is to give consumers information to empower them so that they can make choices," she added in an interview.The ASRM had established $5,000 as the upper limit for standard egg compensation, with payments above $10,000 "beyond what is appropriate." But there remains no objective way to put a price on human ova, the researchers note in a report in the journal Fertility and Sterility.The ASRM had suggested a formula based on multiplying the average number of hours an egg donor spends in a medical setting -- 56 -- with the standard payment for a sperm donation. Based on a sperm donor payment of $65 to $70 in 2000 dollars, the ASRM came up with a "justifiable" price of $3,360 to $4,200 per egg.In the current study, the researchers contacted 394 SART member clinics, and 191 responded. Eighty percent said they paid the same fee to all donors. There was some regional variation in compensation, ranging from roughly $5,000, on average, for the northeastern and western US to $2,900 in the northwestern part of the country.Covington and Gibbons admit their analysis does not cover the entire field of donor egg payment; one western agency had told SART it couldn't comply with the society's guidelines and compete in the marketplace. And the researchers did not survey donor egg agencies, they note, which represent a "burgeoning, consumer-driven industry." Such agencies must agree to comply with ASRM and SART standards in order to be listed on their Web sites, the researchers add, but "it is unclear whether they are in fact doing so."?Nevertheless, Covington and Gibbons conclude, their "reassuring" findings indicate that the "vast majority" of fertility clinics are complying with ASRM guidelines on donor egg compensation.SOURCE: Fertility and Sterility, May 2007.http://uk.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUKFLE16477220070531?pageNumber=2

Divorced Couple Battling Over Embryos - MSNBC

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=25199450-167c-49ae-bfa5-d64427b5e341 video link here The case of Roman v. Roman is boiling over into the Texas Supreme Court.

This morning, we ran a story on Augusta and Randy Roman, a divorced couple that -- when they were married -- had planned to conceive a child through in-vitro fertilization.?

But divorce complicated their plans and brought about a legal and ethical issue -- what should be done with frozen embryos after a couple gets divorced?

Augusta, her lawyer, and Randy's lawyer also joined Meredith for a live interview this morning.

Doctors had retrieved 13 eggs from Augusta's ovaries, and six had been fertilized with Randy's sperm. But just hours before the embryos were to be implanted into Augusta's womb, Randy got cold feet. He canceled the procedure, and the embryos were frozen while the couple underwent counseling.

Counseling didn't work, and their 6-year marriage soon dissolved.

Augusta has argued that she should be allowed to implant the embryos and attempt to have a child. And she has agreed to absolve Randy of any financial or parental obligations.

Since the couple is no longer together, Randy wants the embryos destroyed -- or at least frozen indefinitely -- and cites a cryopreservation consent form the couple had signed that stipulated that if they were to divorce, the embryos would be discarded.

The Texas Supreme Court will decide whether to hear the case later this year.

Who do you think is right? Should the courts allow her to use the embryos? Should Randy just allow Augusta to use the frozen embryos or should he stand firm?

http://allday.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/05/31/209482.aspx

'De facto' parent's visitation on trial

Abraham Center of Life No Longer in Embryo Business

For Immediate Releasehttp://newsroom.eworldwire.com/view_release.php?id=17092SAN ANTONIO, Texas/EWORLDWIRE/May 30, 2007 --- The Abraham Center of Life LLC is sorry to announce that they will no longer offer embryos to potential infertile families.The company, owned by Jennalee Ryan, who also operates Abagails Silver Spoon Adoptions, was created as a very cost effective method of pregnancy for infertile families.Contrary to some reports, The Abraham Center of Life was never established to generate revenue but as a way of "giving back" by giving an opportunity to so many people desperate for a child that cannot afford the extremely high cost of adoption.At the very best, it was a break even enterprise. However, regrettably, it is no longer cost effective to operate at such an extreme loss.It will, however, continue as an advertising agency for surrogates and egg donors, and attempt to offer options to the thousands of potential parents that have contacted them worldwide.

Woman defends decision to give birth at 60

Those who believe it is wrong for older women to bear children need to get in step with a society that is living longer, a 60-year-old woman who gave birth to twins this week said Thursday on TODAY.

"It's wonderful. It's wonderful," Frieda Birnbaum, who delivered healthy baby boys on Tuesday, said during a live interview from a New Jersey hospital. Birnbarm is believed to be the oldest woman ever to give birth to twins in the U.S.

"I think those people need to get ready for what's coming up in our society. Whenever there's anything new, people cannot comprehend or have difficulty getting comfortable," she said. "There are a lot of middle-aged women [having babies] - 40s, 50s, now I just turned 60. That's going to be acceptable. They have to just keep up with what's going on with society."

Birnbaum and her husband of 38 years, New York attorney Ken Birnbaum, traveled to South Africa last year to a center that specializes in in-vitro fertilization of older women. The procedure was a success. It surprised no one more than Birnbaum's obstetrician, Dr. Abdulla Al-Khan.

? ?Wow!? was my reaction. I had a little difficulty believing she was pregnant, until we confirmed it with ultrasound,? Al-Khan told TODAY anchor Meredith Vieira.

Birnbaum's adult children had trouble believing it, too. Alana Birnbaum, 29, told the New York Daily News that she was against her parents' decision to have another child so late in life.

?She's youthful for her age but I don't think it's good,? Alana Birnbaum told the tabloid. ?She should be going to the gym and taking time for herself ? not taking on more stresses and responsibilities ... Am I happy at all about this? No. I'm not,? she said.

Her choice Asked about her daughter's comment by Vieira, Frieda Birnbaum said the decision was hers and her husband?s to make, and she hopes someday her daughter ? and others ? will realize how much freedom modern women have and feel empowered by it.

?I hope I'm a role model for my daughter, that when she gets older she can make her own decision based on who she is, rather than what society dictates,? Birnbaum said.

The boys, who tipped the scales at 4 pounds, 11 ounces each when they were delivered by C-section within minutes of each other at the Hackensack University Medical Center, are doing well. The couple named them Jake and Jared.

The Birnbaums also have two other sons ? ages 33 and 6. Frieda told Fox News that part of the reason for her decision was that she wanted her younger child to have siblings closer to his age.

Al-Khan cautioned that having children late in life is risky for mother and child. He recommended that anyone considering it consult a physician first, become informed and seek out counseling to make sure late-life motherhood is what they really want.

?I can't be judgmental about that. This has taught me to be very open-minded,? Al-Khan said.

Earlier this year, a woman in Spain delivered twins at age 67, believed to be a world record.

Birnbaum and her sons are scheduled to leave the hospital on Saturday.

60 Year Old Woman Gives Birth in US to Twins

Couple Says Surrogate Mother Is Stealing Their Baby - Florida - WARNING: this is a Florida case involving a traditional surrogate who is genetically related to the baby

http://www.wftv.com/news/13375953/detail.htmlOVIEDO, Fla. -- An Oviedo couple said they're being extorted and defrauded by a surrogate mother. The couple hired a woman from Jacksonville to have their baby, but now, they said, she's refusing to give up the baby and is even asking for child support.The Oviedo couple already has one child through a surrogate mother. In that case, everything went perfectly. This time, they tried a different surrogate and said she is trying to steal their baby.The couple believes the baby was born last week, but they can't get any concrete answers. They are taking the issue to court as a crib sits empty and the couple waits for the baby they said their surrogate mom stole from them.The room, decorated in Tinkerbell theme, is awaiting the arrival of the Lamintina's little girl. They were set to name her Rochelle Amber. Now they don't know if they'll ever get to hold her."My biggest fear is we may not be able to bring her home. That's what's so hard," said Gwyn Lamintina.She said they had such a wonderful experience having a surrogate for their first child, TJ, that they looked forward to the process again, but she and her husband Tom said it has been awful."I just hope and I pray everything will work out alright," Tom said.The surrogate mother, Stephanie Eckard, lives in Jacksonville. At her home, someone inside would only say there was no comment. Then a note was taped on the door: 'No comment. Contact my attorney Kelly Hanson.' So Eyewitness News did."Under the laws of the state of Florida, surrogacy is like adoption. The surrogate mom has the option to keep the baby," Hanson said.That's something the Lamintina's attorney disputes."Is she asking for child support?" WFTV reporter Cynthia Demos asked Hanson."I'm not going to answer that," Hanson said."We didn't think anyone would be that low to scam someone with a baby out of money," Tom said.The DNA test proves that there is a 99.9999 percent chance Tom is the father. The egg is from the surrogate mother. The surrogate did cash the $1,500 deposit, which the Lamintina's hope will work in their favor.However, there is one major sticking point. The surrogate never signed the "surrogacy contract." The Lamintina's said they never checked, because they trusted her. They said they will not give up on until they have their baby girl home.The Lamintina's said they found Eckard on a surrogacy site online. All the lawsuits have been filed in Jacksonville in the Duval County courthouse and the Lamintina's are hoping they will get their Rochelle home by the time she's one.

Sperm Donors Valued Less Than Egg Donors

http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/530278/Newswise ? When Sociologist Rene Almeling decided to look into the operations of U.S. sperm banks and egg agencies, the UCLA Ph.D. candidate in sociology thought she knew what she would find.She figured that any discrepancies in compensation rates for the building blocks of assisted reproduction could be explained by either market forces or the biological differences between female egg donors, who must undergo hormone therapy and outpatient surgery, and their male counterparts, who, as one recruitment ad put it, ?get paid to do what you already do.?Instead, Almeling, whose findings appear in the June issue of the American Sociological Review, uncovered a topsy-turvy market that often defies not just conventional wisdom but also the basic law of supply and demand.?Men donors are paid less for a much longer time commitment and a great deal of personal inconvenience,? she said. ?They also are much less prepared for the emotional consequences of serving as a donor of reproductive material. Women, meanwhile, are not only paid more for a much shorter time commitment, they are repeatedly thanked for ?giving the gift of life.??From compensation rates to the smallest details of donor relations, sperm donors are less valued than egg donors,? Almeling said. ?Egg donors are treated like gold, while sperm donors are perceived as a dime a dozen.?The inequities persist despite the fact that profiles of hundreds of potential egg donors languish on agency Web sites, far outstripping recipient demand, while suitable sperm donors are quite rare, Almeling found. In fact, only a tiny fraction of the male population possesses a sperm count consistently high enough to be considered donation-worthy, and more than 90 percent of sperm bank applicants are rejected for this and other reasons. As a result, sperm banks routinely resort to finder?s fees to meet the need.?A pronounced double-standard exists in the way that men and women donors are valued by the fertility industry, and it can?t be explained medically or by market forces,? Almeling said. ?Based on the availability of donors alone, you would expect the abundance of potential egg donors to drive down compensation fees and the scarcity of potential sperm donors to drive up their fees. But I found just the opposite.Almeling?s findings are part of a growing body of research on the sociology of markets in life-saving and life-giving material, including blood and organ donations and life insurance payouts. But Almeling?s study, which is based on interviews with 25 staff members at two sperm banks and two egg agencies, is believed to be the first detailed comparison of gender-based differences in U.S. compensation rates for reproductive material. Almeling has been gathering data on the medical market in genetic material for the past five years.Almeling found that it is not unusual for egg donors in large cities to make upwards of $5,000 per donation ? no matter the outcome. Agencies also encourage recipient couples to provide female donors with thank-you notes, small tokens of appreciation and even cash bonuses.In contrast, sperm banks do not pay as well or encourage such displays of gratitude. Male donors make between $50 and $75 per donation, and they are paid only when their samples meet the high fertility standards required for freezing. Over the length of their contracts ? generally, an entire year ? sperm donors may make as much as their female counterparts do over the course of a single six-week cycle, but only if they donate more than the required one sample per week. Invariably, however, earnings of sperm donors fell short, either because donors missed weekly sessions or their samples failed to meet fertility standards. Women also may donate as many as three times in a year, and their fees increase with each completed cycle.So an egg donor actually stands to make far more during the same period of time than even the most diligent and fertile sperm donor.Moreover, men work much longer for their pay than women, and their activities are much more restricted as a result. In addition to requiring weekly donations for a year, sperm banks instruct men to refrain from sex for two days prior to donation or risk the possibility that their samples will fail to meet fertility standards. Being sick or stressed also has a negative effect on sperm count.?Even the doctors who were working with infertile couples were surprised when they learned just how demanding the process is for men,? Almeling said. ?Sperm donors basically have to schedule their sex lives for a year.?Meanwhile, their female counterparts also have to refrain from sex, but their activities are restricted only for six weeks. However, the women have to commit to a degree of bodily invasiveness not experienced by men: a six-week regime of hormone therapy, which leads to serious complications in 1 to 2 percent of cases, and a single egg-extraction procedure that causes some discomfort and leads to serious complications in less than 1 out of 1,000 cases, according t