Giving Male Cancer Patients a Better Chance at being a Dad

Wall Street Journal
By KEVIN HELLIKER
November 13, 2007; Page D1

Before David Goodack underwent cancer treatment at age 20, nobody suggested he preserve a sample of his sperm. Mr. Goodack himself didn’t think of it, even though his physician warned that the necessary surgery could render him infertile — as it did. “I was just thinking about surviving,” says Mr. Goodack, a Kansas City, Mo., press foreman, now 44 and childless.

Since Mr. Goodack’s surgery, hundreds of thousands of babies have been conceived with preserved samples of sperm. Yet a September article in the journal Cancer found that during the decade ended in 2005, only 18% of 821 young, male cancer patients had chosen to freeze samples of their sperm before undergoing treatment. Experts say the problem is that amid the terror of a cancer diagnosis, the only immediate concern too often is survival. At a time when survival is more the rule than the exception for young cancer patients, child-bearing options are an unnecessary casualty of treatment.

Continue Reading...

Texas Supreme Court Refuses Rehearing in Frozen Embryo Case

The final chapter for the Romans has occurred as the State Supreme Court has refused to grant a rehearing in this case,  See a copy of a press release that I had written several months ago setting forth all of the details of this case below.  I have heard that Mrs. Roman intends to take this to the US Supreme Court; however, it would be surprising to see that, as this has primarily been handled on the state level. 

 

Continue Reading...
Tags: