Couple Says Surrogate Mother Is Stealing Their Baby - Florida - WARNING: this is a Florida case involving a traditional surrogate who is genetically related to the baby
http://www.wftv.com/news/13375953/detail.html
OVIEDO, Fla. -- An Oviedo couple said they're being extorted and defrauded by a surrogate mother. The couple hired a woman from Jacksonville to have their baby, but now, they said, she's refusing to give up the baby and is even asking for child support.
The Oviedo couple already has one child through a surrogate mother. In that case, everything went perfectly. This time, they tried a different surrogate and said she is trying to steal their baby.
The couple believes the baby was born last week, but they can't get any concrete answers. They are taking the issue to court as a crib sits empty and the couple waits for the baby they said their surrogate mom stole from them.
The room, decorated in Tinkerbell theme, is awaiting the arrival of the Lamintina's little girl. They were set to name her Rochelle Amber. Now they don't know if they'll ever get to hold her.
"My biggest fear is we may not be able to bring her home. That's what's so hard," said Gwyn Lamintina.
She said they had such a wonderful experience having a surrogate for their first child, TJ, that they looked forward to the process again, but she and her husband Tom said it has been awful.
"I just hope and I pray everything will work out alright," Tom said.
The surrogate mother, Stephanie Eckard, lives in Jacksonville. At her home, someone inside would only say there was no comment. Then a note was taped on the door: 'No comment. Contact my attorney Kelly Hanson.' So Eyewitness News did.
"Under the laws of the state of Florida, surrogacy is like adoption. The surrogate mom has the option to keep the baby," Hanson said.
That's something the Lamintina's attorney disputes.
"Is she asking for child support?" WFTV reporter Cynthia Demos asked Hanson.
"I'm not going to answer that," Hanson said.
"We didn't think anyone would be that low to scam someone with a baby out of money," Tom said.
The DNA test proves that there is a 99.9999 percent chance Tom is the father. The egg is from the surrogate mother. The surrogate did cash the $1,500 deposit, which the Lamintina's hope will work in their favor.
However, there is one major sticking point. The surrogate never signed the "surrogacy contract." The Lamintina's said they never checked, because they trusted her. They said they will not give up on until they have their baby girl home.
The Lamintina's said they found Eckard on a surrogacy site online. All the lawsuits have been filed in Jacksonville in the Duval County courthouse and the Lamintina's are hoping they will get their Rochelle home by the time she's one.
She is stealing there baby! I am there first surrogate and she knows this child was never intended for her. She is now seeking child support and asking for full custody. The IP's have not even seen her yet.
She is an evil person for putting this family through this.
Rebekah, could you please contact me as soon as possible. I need to get in contact with the Lamintina's or their attourney. Thank you
?
If you will call me, I can get you help !! 407-366-3349 Tom L
The attorney that is representing Tom Lamitina in the surrogate case was on Fox News last night. His contact information is:
Scott A. Salomon, ESQ.
(954)270-4082
Attorney Salomon owns The Florida Litigation Center in Coral Springs, FL. Click below to go to this website.
www.floridalitigationcenter.com
.
Apryl:
I am the attorney for the Lamintinas. Please feel free to email me at ssalomon@flclegal.com with your information and I will respond quickly. Thank you.
Gwyn & Tom, I saw your story on FoxNews this morning...As someone that's been going thru infertility for 6 yrs, my heart breaks for you. I am praying for you both, and that Rochelle comes home to her rightful parents: YOU.
What has happened here is a travesty. How can a woman using someone else's eggs & sperm sue for child support...What has this world come to...give the Lamintinas what is rightfully theirs....ROCHELLE! and send Stephanie right to jail!!
I want to thank everyone that is following the plight that my clients are going through. With all of your assistance and prayers, we will prevail in the end. If anyone has any information that can assist us, i would appreciate you emailing me directly at ssalomon@flclegal.com. All calls will be kept in confidence.
Thank you.
Scott Salomon, Esq.
Wow, that is so sad. I see this story unfolding, but I will keep my hopes up. Surrogacy used her own egg and never signed a contract. That's crazy.
I am going to be going through my own as a dad again, so I'm keeping my eyes open on lots of surrogacy issues. But my prayers are with you that the woman allows the sweet baby to come home.
My Best.
The Lamintinas purchased a baby, and the person who was hired to carry and deliver the baby breached a contract, albeit informal.
It's no different than buying tomatoes.
Of course no one really believes these so-called "parents" really cared about children. They care about the property they purchased.
If they cared about children, they would have adopted one in need of a home. Obviously they have lots of money to throw away on buying one.
They can always buy another child. It will be interesting to see whether contract law is in their favor here or not.
Tom,
Is this the same attorney that you hired to get your baby? It's a common name so let's hope not.
http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/Web_Public_Stories/Subpoena_DBR_Reporter.html
She can not steal her own biological baby!!
The Baby is NOT Tom & Gwyn Lamintinas
The baby is the child of Stephanie Eckard & Tom Lamintinas
That is something Qwyn will have to deal with.
Without a signed contract, there is no reason why a judge will or should take the child away from her biological mother.
They should have used donor eggs
tom,
regarding msg from cheryl, that is the same attorney and i would not recommend him or trust him with anything.
If is isn't in writing it never happened! Was there an attorney involved with the contract?
No contract no deal! I do agree that was a lousy thing for the mother to do and she should be hung. If it isn't in writing it never happened!
Hang that woman!!!